[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] sna: avoid negative timeouts

[Chris Wilson]

On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 10:56:43AM -0500, Felipe Contreras wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 4:15 AM, Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk> wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 04:09:32AM -0500, Felipe Contreras wrote:
> >> On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 3:17 AM, Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk> wrote:
> >> > That will hopefully catch which path is consuming too much time
> >>
> >> This is what I got:
> >>
> >> restarting timeout[2] (14, 0, 0)
> >> restarting timeout[0] (16, 0, 0)
> >> restarting timeout[0] (16, 0, 0)
> >> restarting timeout[2] (14, 0, 0)
> >> restarting timeout[1] (15, 0, 0)
> >> restarting timeout[0] (16, 0, 0)
> >> restarting timeout[0] (16, 0, 0)
> >> restarting timeout[1] (15, 0, 0)
> >> restarting timeout[1] (15, 0, 0)
> >> restarting timeout[-1] (17, 0, 0)
> >
> > Suspiciously like we block for an entire vrefresh to submit one batch.
> > Hmm, do you mind sending me your complete Xorg.0.log?
> 
> Here you go.

Oh, TearFree. That explains it. I plan to fix that up very soon.
Thanks,
-Chris

-- 
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre