[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] sna: avoid negative timeouts
Felipe Contreras
felipe.contreras at gmail.com
Thu Oct 3 17:56:43 CEST 2013
On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 4:15 AM, Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 04:09:32AM -0500, Felipe Contreras wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 3:17 AM, Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk> wrote:
>> > That will hopefully catch which path is consuming too much time
>>
>> This is what I got:
>>
>> restarting timeout[2] (14, 0, 0)
>> restarting timeout[0] (16, 0, 0)
>> restarting timeout[0] (16, 0, 0)
>> restarting timeout[2] (14, 0, 0)
>> restarting timeout[1] (15, 0, 0)
>> restarting timeout[0] (16, 0, 0)
>> restarting timeout[0] (16, 0, 0)
>> restarting timeout[1] (15, 0, 0)
>> restarting timeout[1] (15, 0, 0)
>> restarting timeout[-1] (17, 0, 0)
>
> Suspiciously like we block for an entire vrefresh to submit one batch.
> Hmm, do you mind sending me your complete Xorg.0.log?
Here you go.
BTW, the game is free to play, you just need Steam.
--
Felipe Contreras
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Xorg.0.log
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 19168 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/attachments/20131003/298b3078/attachment.obj>
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list