[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/4] drm-intel-collector - review request

[Paulo Zanoni]

2013/10/7 Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi at gmail.com>:
>
> This is another drm-intel-collector push for review:
> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~vivijim/drm-intel/log/?h=drm-intel-collector
>
> Here goes the list in order for better reviewers assignment:
>
> Patch     drm/i915: check that the i965g/gm 4G limit is really obeyed - Reviewer: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau at intel.com>
> Patch     drm/i915: Asynchronously perform the set-base for a simple modeset - Reviewer: I would prefer Ville review this since he had concerns about sorround code. switch to fbcon is much faster with this patch so I let it here and will try to review by myself if I heard nothing else until next update.
> Patch     drm/i915: implement another plane WM workaround for HSW - Reviewer: If no body else volunteer I'll do this review until next update.
> Patch     drm/i915: Use the real cpu max frequency for ring scaling - Reviewed by Chris.
>
> Overall Process:
>
> drm-intel-collector - review request
>  1. Daniel pushs drm-intel-testing (every 2 weeks)
>  2. I rebase drm-intel-collector onto drm-intel-testing
>  3. Add Reviewer: tag with voluntered reviewers. If you don't believe you should be assigned on a particular patch please don't get mad just tell you wont review or volunteer someone else.
>  4. I resubmit remaining patches for review without picking any new (drm-intel-collector - review request)
>
> drm-intel-collector - updated
>  5. One week later I collect all simple (1-2) patches that wasn't yet reviewed and not queued by Daniel from one testing update until another.
>  6. Request automated QA's PRTS automated i-g-t tests comparing drm-intel-testing x drm-intel-collector
>  7. If tests are ok I send the update notification or the patches as a series to intel-gfx mailing list for better tracking and to be reviewed. (drm-intel-collector - updated)
>  8. Let me know volunteers for review new patches and also let me know if I've picked any patch that I shouldn't.
>
> There are some reasons that some patches can be left behind:
> 1. Your patch didn't applied cleanly and I couldn't easily solve the conflicts.
> 2. Kernel didn't compiled with your patch.
> 3. I simply missed it. If you believe this is the case please warn me.
>
> Please help me to get these patches reviewed and queued by Daniel.
>
> Also, please let me know if you have further ideas how to improve this process.
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Rodrigo.
>
>
> Ben Widawsky (1):
>   drm/i915: Use the real cpu max frequency for ring scaling
>
> Chris Wilson (1):
>   drm/i915: Asynchronously perform the set-base for a simple modeset
>
> Daniel Vetter (1):
>   drm/i915: check that the i965g/gm 4G limit is really obeyed
>
> Paulo Zanoni (1):
>   drm/i915: implement another plane WM workaround for HSW

Please just discard this one, it was replaced by other patches from
Ville, Jani and Paulo.



>
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c      |  3 +++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++----
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c      | 17 +++++++++++------
>  3 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 1.8.1.4
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx



-- 
Paulo Zanoni