[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/4] drm-intel-collector - review request
rodrigo.vivi at gmail.com
Tue Oct 8 16:37:51 CEST 2013
Thanks for the suggestion Ben, will do this on next round!
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 10:57 AM, Paulo Zanoni <przanoni at gmail.com> wrote:
> 2013/10/7 Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi at gmail.com>:
>> This is another drm-intel-collector push for review:
>> Here goes the list in order for better reviewers assignment:
>> Patch drm/i915: check that the i965g/gm 4G limit is really obeyed - Reviewer: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau at intel.com>
>> Patch drm/i915: Asynchronously perform the set-base for a simple modeset - Reviewer: I would prefer Ville review this since he had concerns about sorround code. switch to fbcon is much faster with this patch so I let it here and will try to review by myself if I heard nothing else until next update.
>> Patch drm/i915: implement another plane WM workaround for HSW - Reviewer: If no body else volunteer I'll do this review until next update.
>> Patch drm/i915: Use the real cpu max frequency for ring scaling - Reviewed by Chris.
>> Overall Process:
>> drm-intel-collector - review request
>> 1. Daniel pushs drm-intel-testing (every 2 weeks)
>> 2. I rebase drm-intel-collector onto drm-intel-testing
>> 3. Add Reviewer: tag with voluntered reviewers. If you don't believe you should be assigned on a particular patch please don't get mad just tell you wont review or volunteer someone else.
>> 4. I resubmit remaining patches for review without picking any new (drm-intel-collector - review request)
>> drm-intel-collector - updated
>> 5. One week later I collect all simple (1-2) patches that wasn't yet reviewed and not queued by Daniel from one testing update until another.
>> 6. Request automated QA's PRTS automated i-g-t tests comparing drm-intel-testing x drm-intel-collector
>> 7. If tests are ok I send the update notification or the patches as a series to intel-gfx mailing list for better tracking and to be reviewed. (drm-intel-collector - updated)
>> 8. Let me know volunteers for review new patches and also let me know if I've picked any patch that I shouldn't.
>> There are some reasons that some patches can be left behind:
>> 1. Your patch didn't applied cleanly and I couldn't easily solve the conflicts.
>> 2. Kernel didn't compiled with your patch.
>> 3. I simply missed it. If you believe this is the case please warn me.
>> Please help me to get these patches reviewed and queued by Daniel.
>> Also, please let me know if you have further ideas how to improve this process.
>> Thanks in advance,
>> Ben Widawsky (1):
>> drm/i915: Use the real cpu max frequency for ring scaling
>> Chris Wilson (1):
>> drm/i915: Asynchronously perform the set-base for a simple modeset
>> Daniel Vetter (1):
>> drm/i915: check that the i965g/gm 4G limit is really obeyed
>> Paulo Zanoni (1):
>> drm/i915: implement another plane WM workaround for HSW
> Please just discard this one, it was replaced by other patches from
> Ville, Jani and Paulo.
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 3 +++
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++----
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 17 +++++++++++------
>> 3 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>> Intel-gfx mailing list
>> Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> Paulo Zanoni
More information about the Intel-gfx