[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/7] drm/exynos: Renaming DP training vswing pre emph defines

[Jindal, Sonika]

On 8/28/2014 11:36 AM, Jingoo Han wrote:
> On Thursday, August 28, 2014 1:33 PM, Sonika Sonika wrote:
>> On 8/28/2014 6:25 AM, Jingoo Han wrote:
>>> On Friday, August 08, 2014 7:54 PM, Sonika Jindal wrote:
>>>>
>>>> From: Sonika Jindal <sonika.jindal at intel.com>
>>>>
>>>> Rename the defines to have levels instead of values for vswing and
>>>> pre-emph levels as the values may differ in other scenarios like low vswing of
>>>> eDP1.4 where the values are different.
>>>>
>>>> Done using following cocci patch for each define:
>>>> @@
>>>> @@
>>>>
>>>>    # define DP_TRAIN_VOLTAGE_SWING_400     (0 << 0)
>>>> + # define DP_TRAIN_VOLTAGE_SWING_LEVEL_0     (0 << 0)
>>>>
>>>> ...
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Sonika Jindal <sonika.jindal at intel.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>    drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp_core.c |    4 ++--
>>>>    1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp_core.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp_core.c
>>>> index 4f3c7eb..02602a8 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp_core.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp_core.c
>>>> @@ -329,8 +329,8 @@ static int exynos_dp_link_start(struct exynos_dp_device *dp)
>>>>    		return retval;
>>>>
>>>>    	for (lane = 0; lane < lane_count; lane++)
>>>> -		buf[lane] = DP_TRAIN_PRE_EMPHASIS_0 |
>>>> -			    DP_TRAIN_VOLTAGE_SWING_400;
>>>> +		buf[lane] = DP_TRAIN_PRE_EMPH_LEVEL_0 |
>>>> +			    DP_TRAIN_VOLTAGE_SWING_LEVEL_0;
>>>
>>> NAK!
>>>
>>> It makes build error. Please build your patch, before sending the patch.
>>> It is a rule when submitting patches.
>>>
>>> Please, fix it as follows.
>>>
>>> +		buf[lane] = DP_TRAIN_PRE_EMPHASIS_LEVEL_0|
>>> +			    DP_TRAIN_VOLTAGE_SWING_LEVEL_0;
>>>
>> I think the first patch which you have taken (which adds new defines) is
>> the one from the previous series for the same change. In the second
>> version, I have named them as DP_TRAIN_PRE_EMPH_LEVEL_* which was done
>> using cocci. Following is from that patch:
>
> Oh, I see. Sorry for annoying you.
> However, how about tagging V2, V3.. into patches? For instance,
> '[PATCH V2 3/7] drm/exynos: Renaming DP training vswing pre emph defines'
> It will be helpful, in order to prevent the same mistakes happening again.
>
Actually I had bumped the version in the cover letter. Because last time 
I had changed the version of all the patches (for some other feature), 
somebody asked me to just change the version at the top when it is a series.
Also, this was a different patch altogether done using cocci, so thought 
it should be fine. Will take care next time :)
Thanks,
Sonika
> Also, the patch looks good.
> Acked-by: Jingoo Han <jg1.han at samsung.com>
>
> Best regards,
> Jingoo Han
>
>>    # define DP_TRAIN_PRE_EMPHASIS_0	    (0 << 3)
>> +# define DP_TRAIN_PRE_EMPH_LEVEL_0		(0 << 3)
>>    # define DP_TRAIN_PRE_EMPHASIS_3_5	    (1 << 3)
>> +# define DP_TRAIN_PRE_EMPH_LEVEL_1		(1 << 3)
>>    # define DP_TRAIN_PRE_EMPHASIS_6	    (2 << 3)
>> +# define DP_TRAIN_PRE_EMPH_LEVEL_2		(2 << 3)
>>    # define DP_TRAIN_PRE_EMPHASIS_9_5	    (3 << 3)
>> +# define DP_TRAIN_PRE_EMPH_LEVEL_3		(3 << 3)
>>> Best regards,
>>> Jingoo Han
>>>
>>>>
>>>>    	retval = exynos_dp_write_bytes_to_dpcd(dp, DP_TRAINING_LANE0_SET,
>>>>    			lane_count, buf);
>>>> --
>>>> 1.7.10.4
>>>
>