[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 12/19] drm/i915: sanitize PUNIT register macro definitions

[Imre Deak]

On Thu, 2014-02-20 at 11:46 -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Feb 2014 00:02:13 +0200
> Imre Deak <imre.deak at intel.com> wrote:
> 
> > In the upcoming patches we'll need to access the rest of the fields in
> > the punit power gating register, so prepare for that.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak at intel.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h     | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++------
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c |  4 +++-
> >  2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> > index 2f564ce..5a700e9 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> > @@ -377,14 +377,31 @@
> >  #define   DSPFREQSTAT_MASK			(0x3 << DSPFREQSTAT_SHIFT)
> >  #define   DSPFREQGUAR_SHIFT			14
> >  #define   DSPFREQGUAR_MASK			(0x3 << DSPFREQGUAR_SHIFT)
> > +
> > +enum punit_power_well {
> > +	PUNIT_POWER_WELL_RENDER			= 0,
> > +	PUNIT_POWER_WELL_MEDIA			= 1,
> > +	PUNIT_POWER_WELL_DISP2D			= 3,
> > +	PUNIT_POWER_WELL_DPIO_CMN_BC		= 5,
> > +	PUNIT_POWER_WELL_DPIO_TX_B_LANES_01	= 6,
> > +	PUNIT_POWER_WELL_DPIO_TX_B_LANES_23	= 7,
> > +	PUNIT_POWER_WELL_DPIO_TX_C_LANES_01	= 8,
> > +	PUNIT_POWER_WELL_DPIO_TX_C_LANES_23	= 9,
> > +	PUNIT_POWER_WELL_DPIO_RX0		= 10,
> > +	PUNIT_POWER_WELL_DPIO_RX1		= 11,
> > +	PUNIT_POWER_WELL_DPIO_RX2		= 12,
> > +	PUNIT_POWER_WELL_DPIO_RX3		= 13,
> > +
> > +	PUNIT_POWER_WELL_NUM,
> > +};
> > +
> >  #define PUNIT_REG_PWRGT_CTRL			0x60
> >  #define PUNIT_REG_PWRGT_STATUS			0x61
> > -#define	  PUNIT_CLK_GATE			1
> > -#define	  PUNIT_PWR_RESET			2
> > -#define	  PUNIT_PWR_GATE			3
> > -#define	  RENDER_PWRGT				(PUNIT_PWR_GATE << 0)
> > -#define	  MEDIA_PWRGT				(PUNIT_PWR_GATE << 2)
> > -#define	  DISP2D_PWRGT				(PUNIT_PWR_GATE << 6)
> > +#define   PUNIT_PWRGT_MASK(power_well)		(3 << ((power_well) * 2))
> > +#define   PUNIT_PWRGT_PWR_ON(power_well)	(0 << ((power_well) * 2))
> > +#define   PUNIT_PWRGT_CLK_GATE(power_well)	(1 << ((power_well) * 2))
> > +#define   PUNIT_PWRGT_RESET(power_well)		(2 << ((power_well) * 2))
> > +#define   PUNIT_PWRGT_PWR_GATE(power_well)	(3 << ((power_well) * 2))
> >  
> >  #define PUNIT_REG_GPU_LFM			0xd3
> >  #define PUNIT_REG_GPU_FREQ_REQ			0xd4
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
> > index c628414..4aab7c2 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
> > @@ -354,7 +354,9 @@ void intel_uncore_sanitize(struct drm_device *dev)
> >  		mutex_lock(&dev_priv->rps.hw_lock);
> >  		reg_val = vlv_punit_read(dev_priv, PUNIT_REG_PWRGT_STATUS);
> >  
> > -		if (reg_val & (RENDER_PWRGT | MEDIA_PWRGT | DISP2D_PWRGT))
> > +		if (reg_val & (PUNIT_PWRGT_PWR_GATE(PUNIT_POWER_WELL_RENDER) |
> > +			       PUNIT_PWRGT_PWR_GATE(PUNIT_POWER_WELL_MEDIA) |
> > +			       PUNIT_PWRGT_PWR_GATE(PUNIT_POWER_WELL_DISP2D)))
> >  			vlv_punit_write(dev_priv, PUNIT_REG_PWRGT_CTRL, 0x0);
> >  
> >  		mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->rps.hw_lock);
> 
> I'd like to see a doc reference here, as I never remember which one has
> these bits...

It's the PUNIT 0.8 HAS, will add a comment about it here.

>   Also, are you sure about the RX bits?  The
> PUNIT_HAS_0.8 doc says only subsystems 10-11 cover RX, maybe in a ganged
> config?

You're right, I overlooked this, there are only 2 RX lanes. We don't use
them atm, but we'll still need to disable those wells. I'll fix this up.

--Imre

> 
> Otherwise:
> Reviewed-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes at virtuousgeek.org>
> 

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 490 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/attachments/20140224/d6071f0d/attachment.sig>