[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 13/19] drm/i915: factor out reset_vblank_counter
Imre Deak
imre.deak at intel.com
Mon Feb 17 23:02:14 CET 2014
We need to do the same for other platforms in upcoming patches.
Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak at intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 14 ++++++++++----
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
index 9cb7ed6..e81e7de 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
@@ -5249,11 +5249,19 @@ static void hsw_power_well_post_enable(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
}
}
+static void reset_vblank_counter(struct drm_device *dev, enum pipe p)
+{
+ unsigned long irqflags;
+
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&dev->vbl_lock, irqflags);
+ dev->vblank[p].last = 0;
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev->vbl_lock, irqflags);
+}
+
static void hsw_power_well_post_disable(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
{
struct drm_device *dev = dev_priv->dev;
enum pipe p;
- unsigned long irqflags;
/*
* After this, the registers on the pipes that are part of the power
@@ -5262,11 +5270,9 @@ static void hsw_power_well_post_disable(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
*
* FIXME: Should we do this in general in drm_vblank_post_modeset?
*/
- spin_lock_irqsave(&dev->vbl_lock, irqflags);
for_each_pipe(p)
if (p != PIPE_A)
- dev->vblank[p].last = 0;
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev->vbl_lock, irqflags);
+ reset_vblank_counter(dev, p);
}
static void hsw_set_power_well(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
--
1.8.4
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list