[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/3] drm/i915: Updating comments.

[Rodrigo Vivi]

ring index calculation table was out of date after other rings were added,
although the formula is flexible and scale when adding new rings.

So this patch just update the comments and add a brief explanation
why to use sync_seqno[ring index].

Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi at intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c         | 2 ++
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h | 8 +++++---
 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
index f6d1238..e85c85c 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
@@ -2842,6 +2842,8 @@ i915_gem_object_sync(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
 	idx = intel_ring_sync_index(from, to);
 
 	seqno = obj->last_read_seqno;
+	/* Optimization: Avoid semaphore sync when we are sure we already
+	 * waited for an object with higher seqno */
 	if (seqno <= from->semaphore.sync_seqno[idx])
 		return 0;
 
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h
index e72017b..2e8b516 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h
@@ -238,9 +238,11 @@ intel_ring_sync_index(struct intel_engine_cs *ring,
 	int idx;
 
 	/*
-	 * cs -> 0 = vcs, 1 = bcs
-	 * vcs -> 0 = bcs, 1 = cs,
-	 * bcs -> 0 = cs, 1 = vcs.
+	 * rcs -> 0 = vcs, 1 = bcs, 2 = vecs, 3 = vcs2;
+	 * vcs -> 0 = bcs, 1 = vecs, 2 = vcs2, 3 = rcs;
+	 * bcs -> 0 = vecs, 1 = vcs2. 2 = rcs, 3 = vcs;
+	 * vecs -> 0 = vcs2, 1 = rcs, 2 = vcs, 3 = bcs;
+	 * vcs2 -> 0 = rcs, 1 = vcs, 2 = bcs, 3 = vecs;
 	 */
 
 	idx = (other - ring) - 1;
-- 
1.9.3