[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/10] drm/i915: Make semaphore updates more precise

[Rodrigo Vivi]

From: Ben Widawsky <ben at bwidawsk.net>

With the ring mask we now have an easy way to know the number of rings
in the system, and therefore can accurately predict the number of dwords
to emit for semaphore signalling. This was not possible (easily)
previously.

There should be no functional impact, simply fewer instructions emitted.

While we're here, simply do the round up to 2 instead of the fancier
rounding we did before, which rounding up per mbox, ie 4. This also
allows us to drop the unnecessary MI_NOOP, so not really 4, 3.

v2: Use 3 dwords instead of 4 (Ville)
Do the proper calculation to get the number of dwords to emit (Ville)
Conditionally set .sync_to when semaphores are enabled (Ville)

v3: Rebased on VCS2
Replace hweight_long with hweight32 (Ville)

v4: Pull out the accidentally squashed hunk from the next patch after
rebase (Daniel).

v5: Fix conflict after rebase (Rodrigo)

Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi at intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com> (v1)
Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben at bwidawsk.net>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi at intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c | 27 +++++++++------------------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
index 2faef26..5c20536 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
@@ -679,23 +679,16 @@ static int gen6_signal(struct intel_engine_cs *signaller,
 	struct drm_device *dev = signaller->dev;
 	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
 	struct intel_engine_cs *useless;
-	int i, ret;
+	int i, ret, num_rings;
 
-	/* NB: In order to be able to do semaphore MBOX updates for varying
-	 * number of rings, it's easiest if we round up each individual update
-	 * to a multiple of 2 (since ring updates must always be a multiple of
-	 * 2) even though the actual update only requires 3 dwords.
-	 */
-#define MBOX_UPDATE_DWORDS 4
-	if (i915_semaphore_is_enabled(dev))
-		num_dwords += ((I915_NUM_RINGS-1) * MBOX_UPDATE_DWORDS);
-	else
-		return intel_ring_begin(signaller, num_dwords);
+#define MBOX_UPDATE_DWORDS 3
+	num_rings = hweight32(INTEL_INFO(dev)->ring_mask);
+	num_dwords += round_up((num_rings-1) * MBOX_UPDATE_DWORDS, 2);
+#undef MBOX_UPDATE_DWORDS
 
 	ret = intel_ring_begin(signaller, num_dwords);
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
-#undef MBOX_UPDATE_DWORDS
 
 	for_each_ring(useless, dev_priv, i) {
 		u32 mbox_reg = signaller->semaphore.mbox.signal[i];
@@ -703,15 +696,13 @@ static int gen6_signal(struct intel_engine_cs *signaller,
 			intel_ring_emit(signaller, MI_LOAD_REGISTER_IMM(1));
 			intel_ring_emit(signaller, mbox_reg);
 			intel_ring_emit(signaller, signaller->outstanding_lazy_seqno);
-			intel_ring_emit(signaller, MI_NOOP);
-		} else {
-			intel_ring_emit(signaller, MI_NOOP);
-			intel_ring_emit(signaller, MI_NOOP);
-			intel_ring_emit(signaller, MI_NOOP);
-			intel_ring_emit(signaller, MI_NOOP);
 		}
 	}
 
+	/* If num_dwords was rounded, make sure the tail pointer is correct */
+	if (num_rings % 2 == 0)
+		intel_ring_emit(signaller, MI_NOOP);
+
 	return 0;
 }
 
-- 
1.9.3