[Intel-gfx] [v2] drm/i915: Add support for Generic MIPI panel driver

[Kumar, Shobhit]

On 5/27/2014 5:09 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 04:51:55PM +0530, Kumar, Shobhit wrote:
>> On 5/27/2014 4:32 PM, Damien Lespiau wrote:
>>> On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 09:35:27PM +0530, Shobhit Kumar wrote:
>>>> This driver makes use of the generic panel information from the VBT.
>>>> Panel information is classified into two - panel configuration and panel
>>>> power sequence which is unique to each panel. The generic driver uses the
>>>> panel configuration and sequence parsed from VBT block #52 and #53
>>>>
>>>> v2: Address review comments by Jani
>>>>      - Move all of the things in driver c file from header
>>>>      - Make all functions static
>>>>      - Make use of video/mipi_display.c instead of redefining
>>>>      - Null checks during sequence execution
>>>>
>>>> v3: Address review comments by Damien
>>>>      - Rename the panel driver file as intel_dsi_panel_vbt.c
>>>>      - Fix style changes as suggested
>>>>      - Correct comments for lp->hs and hs->lp count calculations
>>>>      - General updating comments to have more clarity
>>>>      - using max() instead of ternary operator
>>>>      - Fix names (ui_num, ui_den) while using UI in calculations
>>>>      - compute max of lp_to_hs switch and hs_to_lp switch while computing
>>>>        hs_lp_switch_count
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Shobhit Kumar <shobhit.kumar at intel.com>
>>>
>>> Hopefully still works after all that :)
>>
>> It does, at least on AsusT100 :) Thanks for the review
>
> Aside: checkpatch.pl complained a bit about style issues in your patch
> (like unpretty alignment of continuation lines and stuff like that).
> Please feed your patches to checkpatch if you don't have an editor that
> simply gets this right.

Hmm, I will check my vim config and be more careful next time. Thanks 
for pointing out. Have you taken care of these or I will push another 
patch to fix the alignment issues ?

Regards
Shobhit

> -Daniel
>