[Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 1/2] tests/kms_force_connector: ensure igt_exit is called at exit
Gore, Tim
tim.gore at intel.com
Fri Oct 10 09:33:46 CEST 2014
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thomas Wood [mailto:thomas.wood at intel.com]
> Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2014 5:10 PM
> To: Gore, Tim
> Cc: intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH i-g-t 1/2] tests/kms_force_connector: ensure igt_exit is
> called at exit
>
> On 9 October 2014 17:00, Gore, Tim <tim.gore at intel.com> wrote:
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Thomas Wood [mailto:thomas.wood at intel.com]
> >> Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2014 4:51 PM
> >> To: intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> >> Cc: Gore, Tim
> >> Subject: [PATCH i-g-t 1/2] tests/kms_force_connector: ensure igt_exit
> >> is called at exit
> >>
> >> Since commit 5782eca (lib/igt_core.c: disable lowmemorykiller during
> >> tests), igt_exit needs to be called before the test exits.
> >>
> >> Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=84771
> >> Cc: Tim Gore <tim.gore at intel.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Thomas Wood <thomas.wood at intel.com>
> >
> > Hi Thomas, did you see Paulo's suggestion about replacing
> > igt_assert(connector) with igt_require(connector). Does this make
> > sense. I'm not sure if any systems truly have no vga "connector", but
> > certainly on my harris beach (ultrabook) there Is no externally accessible
> vga.
> > Or perhaps you would prefer that to be a separate commit.
>
> Yes, it's addressed in patch 2 of this series.
>
OK, this patch looks fine to me
> >
> > Tim
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >> ---
> >> tests/kms_force_connector.c | 2 +-
> >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/tests/kms_force_connector.c
> >> b/tests/kms_force_connector.c index 5b19794..96881c7 100644
> >> --- a/tests/kms_force_connector.c
> >> +++ b/tests/kms_force_connector.c
> >> @@ -116,5 +116,5 @@ main (int argc, char **argv)
> >>
> >> drmModeFreeConnector(connector);
> >>
> >> - igt_success();
> >> + igt_exit();
> >> }
> >> --
> >> 2.1.0
> >
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list