[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: WARN if interrupts aren't on in en/disable_pipestat

[Daniel Vetter]

On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 1:00 AM, Jesse Barnes <jbarnes at virtuousgeek.org> wrote:
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
>> index 9eb303c1b621..76bc4d0de5a4 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
>> @@ -589,6 +589,7 @@ __i915_enable_pipestat(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, enum pipe pipe,
>>       u32 pipestat = I915_READ(reg) & PIPESTAT_INT_ENABLE_MASK;
>>
>>       assert_spin_locked(&dev_priv->irq_lock);
>> +     WARN_ON(!intel_irqs_enabled(dev_priv));
>>
>>       if (WARN_ONCE(enable_mask & ~PIPESTAT_INT_ENABLE_MASK ||
>>                     status_mask & ~PIPESTAT_INT_STATUS_MASK,
>> @@ -615,6 +616,7 @@ __i915_disable_pipestat(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, enum pipe pipe,
>>       u32 pipestat = I915_READ(reg) & PIPESTAT_INT_ENABLE_MASK;
>>
>>       assert_spin_locked(&dev_priv->irq_lock);
>> +     WARN_ON(!intel_irqs_enabled(dev_priv));
>>
>>       if (WARN_ONCE(enable_mask & ~PIPESTAT_INT_ENABLE_MASK ||
>>                     status_mask & ~PIPESTAT_INT_STATUS_MASK,
>
> Yeah looks good, wonder if it'll trigger any new warnings.

It will blow up in a bunch of postinstall hooks, just like the one for
ilk. At least without my patch to shuffle the pm._irqs_disabled
assignment around.

> Reviewed-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes at virtuousgeek.org>

... so does that count as an implicit r-b on my other patch?
-Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch