[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: WARN if interrupts aren't on in en/disable_pipestat

[Jesse Barnes]

On Thu, 4 Sep 2014 17:59:18 +0200
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch> wrote:

> On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 1:00 AM, Jesse Barnes <jbarnes at virtuousgeek.org> wrote:
> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> >> index 9eb303c1b621..76bc4d0de5a4 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> >> @@ -589,6 +589,7 @@ __i915_enable_pipestat(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, enum pipe pipe,
> >>       u32 pipestat = I915_READ(reg) & PIPESTAT_INT_ENABLE_MASK;
> >>
> >>       assert_spin_locked(&dev_priv->irq_lock);
> >> +     WARN_ON(!intel_irqs_enabled(dev_priv));
> >>
> >>       if (WARN_ONCE(enable_mask & ~PIPESTAT_INT_ENABLE_MASK ||
> >>                     status_mask & ~PIPESTAT_INT_STATUS_MASK,
> >> @@ -615,6 +616,7 @@ __i915_disable_pipestat(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, enum pipe pipe,
> >>       u32 pipestat = I915_READ(reg) & PIPESTAT_INT_ENABLE_MASK;
> >>
> >>       assert_spin_locked(&dev_priv->irq_lock);
> >> +     WARN_ON(!intel_irqs_enabled(dev_priv));
> >>
> >>       if (WARN_ONCE(enable_mask & ~PIPESTAT_INT_ENABLE_MASK ||
> >>                     status_mask & ~PIPESTAT_INT_STATUS_MASK,
> >
> > Yeah looks good, wonder if it'll trigger any new warnings.
> 
> It will blow up in a bunch of postinstall hooks, just like the one for
> ilk. At least without my patch to shuffle the pm._irqs_disabled
> assignment around.
> 
> > Reviewed-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes at virtuousgeek.org>
> 
> ... so does that count as an implicit r-b on my other patch?

Sure, though didn't Jani find some issues with it?

-- 
Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center