[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/chv: Implement Wa4x4STCOptimizationDisable:chv
Chris Wilson
chris at chris-wilson.co.uk
Thu Sep 18 10:14:19 CEST 2014
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 11:08:23AM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 05:03:02AM -0700, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> > Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi at intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c | 4 ++++
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
> > index 4e8b2ea..50d9169 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
> > @@ -784,6 +784,10 @@ static int chv_init_workarounds(struct intel_engine_cs *ring)
> > intel_ring_emit_wa(ring, GEN8_ROW_CHICKEN,
> > _MASKED_BIT_ENABLE(STALL_DOP_GATING_DISABLE));
> >
> > + /* Wa4x4STCOptimizationDisable:chv */
> > + intel_ring_emit_wa(ring, CACHE_MODE_1,
> > + _MASKED_BIT_ENABLE(GEN8_4x4_STC_OPTIMIZATION_DISABLE));
> > +
>
> Let's try to keep these in some order shall we. So please put this as
> the last w/a.
>
> Also you need to reserve more ring space, and because the ring tail must
> be QW aligned you need to toss in a MI_NOOP when the number of wa emits
> is odd. Maybe we should try to avoid future churn here and do something
> like:
>
> int num_wa = 5;
>
> intel_ring_begin(ALIGN(num_wa * 3, 2));
>
> intel_ring_emit_wa(...);
> ...
>
> if ((num_wa * 3) & 1)
> ring_emit(MI_NOOP);
>
> intel_ring_advance();
Or since we batch up the tail writes, we can do the final padding then,
so long as we always check for qword space in intel_ring_begin.
Patch on ml.
-Chris
--
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list