[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/skl: Use correct use counters for force wakes

Mika Kuoppala mika.kuoppala at linux.intel.com
Thu Sep 25 14:05:27 CEST 2014


Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau at intel.com> writes:

> On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 11:17:00AM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>> From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at intel.com>
>> 
>> Write and reads following the block changed use engine specific use counters
>> and unless that is matched here force wake use counting goes bad. Same
>> force wake is attempted to be taken twice which leads to at least time outs.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at intel.com>
>
> Is it worth a v2 to have gen >= 9 here?

I think we should have gen >= 8 here.

Shadowed ELSP's seems not to work on gen8. And the posting read will
need fw anyways.

Assuming the shadowing works on skl and we can get rid of the posting
read, we could run this part without taking forcewake.

-Mika

> -- 
> Damien
>
>> ---
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c | 4 ++--
>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
>> index 3048d78..4b33767 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
>> @@ -301,7 +301,7 @@ static void execlists_elsp_write(struct intel_engine_cs *ring,
>>  	 * Instead, we do the runtime_pm_get/put when creating/destroying requests.
>>  	 */
>>  	spin_lock_irqsave(&dev_priv->uncore.lock, flags);
>> -	if (IS_CHERRYVIEW(dev_priv->dev)) {
>> +	if (IS_CHERRYVIEW(dev_priv->dev) || IS_GEN9(dev_priv->dev)) {
>>  		if (dev_priv->uncore.fw_rendercount++ == 0)
>>  			dev_priv->uncore.funcs.force_wake_get(dev_priv,
>>  							      FORCEWAKE_RENDER);
>> @@ -326,7 +326,7 @@ static void execlists_elsp_write(struct intel_engine_cs *ring,
>>  
>>  	/* Release Force Wakeup (see the big comment above). */
>>  	spin_lock_irqsave(&dev_priv->uncore.lock, flags);
>> -	if (IS_CHERRYVIEW(dev_priv->dev)) {
>> +	if (IS_CHERRYVIEW(dev_priv->dev) || IS_GEN9(dev_priv->dev)) {
>>  		if (--dev_priv->uncore.fw_rendercount == 0)
>>  			dev_priv->uncore.funcs.force_wake_put(dev_priv,
>>  							      FORCEWAKE_RENDER);
>> -- 
>> 2.1.0
>> 
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx



More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list