[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/70] drm/i915: Agressive downclocking on Baytrail
Chris Wilson
chris at chris-wilson.co.uk
Tue Apr 7 08:20:28 PDT 2015
Reuse the same reclocking strategy for Baytail as on its bigger brethren,
Sandybridge and Ivybridge. In particular, this makes the device quicker
to reclock (both up and down) though the tendency now is to downclock
more aggressively to compensate for the RPS boosts.
v2: Rebase
v3: Exclude Cherrytrail as Deepak was concerned that the increased
number of register writes would wake the common powerwell too often.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Deepak S <deepak.s at linux.intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi at intel.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch>
Reviewed-by: Deepak S <deepak.s at linux.intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 3 +++
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c | 4 ++--
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 2 --
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 8 +++++++-
4 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
index 51b21483b95f..31011988d153 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
@@ -1036,6 +1036,9 @@ struct intel_gen6_power_mgmt {
u8 rp0_freq; /* Non-overclocked max frequency. */
u32 cz_freq;
+ u8 up_threshold; /* Current %busy required to uplock */
+ u8 down_threshold; /* Current %busy required to downclock */
+
int last_adj;
enum { LOW_POWER, BETWEEN, HIGH_POWER } power;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
index 14ecb4d13a1a..128a6f40b450 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
@@ -1049,7 +1049,7 @@ static u32 vlv_wa_c0_ei(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, u32 pm_iir)
if (pm_iir & GEN6_PM_RP_DOWN_EI_EXPIRED) {
if (!vlv_c0_above(dev_priv,
&dev_priv->rps.down_ei, &now,
- VLV_RP_DOWN_EI_THRESHOLD))
+ dev_priv->rps.down_threshold))
events |= GEN6_PM_RP_DOWN_THRESHOLD;
dev_priv->rps.down_ei = now;
}
@@ -1057,7 +1057,7 @@ static u32 vlv_wa_c0_ei(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, u32 pm_iir)
if (pm_iir & GEN6_PM_RP_UP_EI_EXPIRED) {
if (vlv_c0_above(dev_priv,
&dev_priv->rps.up_ei, &now,
- VLV_RP_UP_EI_THRESHOLD))
+ dev_priv->rps.up_threshold))
events |= GEN6_PM_RP_UP_THRESHOLD;
dev_priv->rps.up_ei = now;
}
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
index 12e6fd1bc1f0..626db2b134c7 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
@@ -671,8 +671,6 @@ enum skl_disp_power_wells {
#define FB_FMAX_VMIN_FREQ_LO_MASK 0xf8000000
#define VLV_CZ_CLOCK_TO_MILLI_SEC 100000
-#define VLV_RP_UP_EI_THRESHOLD 90
-#define VLV_RP_DOWN_EI_THRESHOLD 70
/* vlv2 north clock has */
#define CCK_FUSE_REG 0x8
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
index 63e642bc9713..50c03472ea41 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
@@ -3934,6 +3934,8 @@ static void gen6_set_rps_thresholds(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, u8 val)
GEN6_RP_DOWN_IDLE_AVG);
dev_priv->rps.power = new_power;
+ dev_priv->rps.up_threshold = threshold_up;
+ dev_priv->rps.down_threshold = threshold_down;
dev_priv->rps.last_adj = 0;
}
@@ -4005,8 +4007,11 @@ static void valleyview_set_rps(struct drm_device *dev, u8 val)
"Odd GPU freq value\n"))
val &= ~1;
- if (val != dev_priv->rps.cur_freq)
+ if (val != dev_priv->rps.cur_freq) {
vlv_punit_write(dev_priv, PUNIT_REG_GPU_FREQ_REQ, val);
+ if (!IS_CHERRYVIEW(dev_priv))
+ gen6_set_rps_thresholds(dev_priv, val);
+ }
I915_WRITE(GEN6_PMINTRMSK, gen6_rps_pm_mask(dev_priv, val));
@@ -4055,6 +4060,7 @@ static void vlv_set_rps_idle(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
& GENFREQSTATUS) == 0, 100))
DRM_ERROR("timed out waiting for Punit\n");
+ gen6_set_rps_thresholds(dev_priv, val);
vlv_force_gfx_clock(dev_priv, false);
I915_WRITE(GEN6_PMINTRMSK, gen6_rps_pm_mask(dev_priv, val));
--
2.1.4
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list