[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/4] drm/i915: Untangle execlist tracking

[Daniel Vetter]

On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 09:48:31AM +0000, Daniel, Thomas wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Intel-gfx [mailto:intel-gfx-bounces at lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf
> > Of Nick Hoath
> > Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2015 1:11 PM
> > To: intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> > Cc: daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch
> > Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/4] drm/i915: Untangle execlist tracking
> > 
> > This patchset merges execlist queue items in to gem requests. It does this by
> > using the reference count added by the "Replace seqno values with request
> > structures" patchset to ensure that the gem request is available for the
> > whole execlist submission lifespan.
> > 
> > v2: merge intel_ctx_submit_request and drm_i915_gem_request, rebase
> > changes &
> >    add cover letter
> > 
> > v3: Rebase over upstreamed "Replace seqno values with request structures"
> > and add overzealous freeing fix.
> > 
> > v4: Removed re-addition of cleanup work queue (found by Daniel Vetter)
> > v5: Fixed non-building individual patch (0002). Separated out the tail pointer
> > from the postfix pointer (found by Thomas Daniel)
> > v6: Actual removal of intel_ctx_submit_request. Update both tail and postfix
> > pointer in __i915_add_request (found by Thomas Daniel)
> > v7: Removed unrelated changes
> Well, I'm happy with v7 of this patchset now.
> Reviewed-by: Thomas Daniel <thomas.daniel at intel.com>

Entire series merged, thanks a lot for patches&review. I've reformatted
one comment in patch 4 while applying, linebreaks got screwed up a bit
somehow.
-Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch