[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3] drm/i915/bxt: BUNs related to port PLL
Kannan, Vandana
vandana.kannan at intel.com
Thu Jul 2 21:53:48 PDT 2015
Hi,
Any other review comments on this patch? Do let me know.
Siva and Sonika have given their R-b.
Thanks,
Vandana
On 7/1/2015 4:41 PM, Sivakumar Thulasimani wrote:
> thanks for the changes.
>
> Reviewed-by: Sivakumar Thulasimani <sivakumar.thulasimani at intel.com>
>
>
>
> On 7/1/2015 5:02 PM, Vandana Kannan wrote:
>> This patch contains changes based on 2 updates to the spec:
>> Port PLL VCO restriction raised up to 6700.
>> Port PLL now needs DCO amp override enable for all VCO frequencies.
>>
>> v2: Sonika's review comment addressed
>> - dcoampovr_en_h variable not required
>> Based on a discussion with Siva, the following changes have been made.
>> - replace dco_amp var with #define BXT_DCO_AMPLITUDE
>> - set pll10 in a single assignment
>>
>> v3:
>> Move DCO amplitude default value to i915_reg.h. Suggested by Siva.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Vandana Kannan<vandana.kannan at intel.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Sonika Jindal<sonika.jindal at intel.com> [v2]
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 1 +
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c | 15 +++++----------
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 2 +-
>> 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
>> index ac985c5..d1b8928 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
>> @@ -1211,6 +1211,7 @@ enum skl_disp_power_wells {
>> #define PORT_PLL_LOCK_THRESHOLD_MASK 0xe
>> /* PORT_PLL_10_A */
>> #define PORT_PLL_DCO_AMP_OVR_EN_H (1<<27)
>> +#define PORT_PLL_DCO_AMP_DEFAULT 15
>> #define PORT_PLL_DCO_AMP_MASK 0x3c00
>> #define PORT_PLL_DCO_AMP(x) (x<<10)
>> #define _PORT_PLL_BASE(port) _PORT3(port, _PORT_PLL_0_A, \
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
>> index 42c1487..9c05cc0 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
>> @@ -1455,7 +1455,7 @@ bxt_ddi_pll_select(struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc,
>> struct bxt_clk_div clk_div = {0};
>> int vco = 0;
>> uint32_t prop_coef, int_coef, gain_ctl, targ_cnt;
>> - uint32_t dcoampovr_en_h, dco_amp, lanestagger;
>> + uint32_t lanestagger;
>>
>> if (intel_encoder->type == INTEL_OUTPUT_HDMI) {
>> intel_clock_t best_clock;
>> @@ -1494,9 +1494,7 @@ bxt_ddi_pll_select(struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc,
>> vco = clock * 10 / 2 * clk_div.p1 * clk_div.p2;
>> }
>>
>> - dco_amp = 15;
>> - dcoampovr_en_h = 0;
>> - if (vco >= 6200000 && vco <= 6480000) {
>> + if (vco >= 6200000 && vco <= 6700000) {
>> prop_coef = 4;
>> int_coef = 9;
>> gain_ctl = 3;
>> @@ -1507,8 +1505,6 @@ bxt_ddi_pll_select(struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc,
>> int_coef = 11;
>> gain_ctl = 3;
>> targ_cnt = 9;
>> - if (vco >= 4800000 && vco < 5400000)
>> - dcoampovr_en_h = 1;
>> } else if (vco == 5400000) {
>> prop_coef = 3;
>> int_coef = 8;
>> @@ -1550,10 +1546,9 @@ bxt_ddi_pll_select(struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc,
>>
>> crtc_state->dpll_hw_state.pll8 = targ_cnt;
>>
>> - if (dcoampovr_en_h)
>> - crtc_state->dpll_hw_state.pll10 = PORT_PLL_DCO_AMP_OVR_EN_H;
>> -
>> - crtc_state->dpll_hw_state.pll10 |= PORT_PLL_DCO_AMP(dco_amp);
>> + crtc_state->dpll_hw_state.pll10 =
>> + PORT_PLL_DCO_AMP(PORT_PLL_DCO_AMP_DEFAULT)
>> + | PORT_PLL_DCO_AMP_OVR_EN_H;
>>
>> crtc_state->dpll_hw_state.pcsdw12 =
>> LANESTAGGER_STRAP_OVRD | lanestagger;
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
>> index eb665d7..e04be45 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
>> @@ -409,7 +409,7 @@ static const intel_limit_t intel_limits_chv = {
>> static const intel_limit_t intel_limits_bxt = {
>> /* FIXME: find real dot limits */
>> .dot = { .min = 0, .max = INT_MAX },
>> - .vco = { .min = 4800000, .max = 6480000 },
>> + .vco = { .min = 4800000, .max = 6700000 },
>> .n = { .min = 1, .max = 1 },
>> .m1 = { .min = 2, .max = 2 },
>> /* FIXME: find real m2 limits */
>
> --
> regards,
> Sivakumar
>
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list