[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 17/18] drm/i915: Wa32bitGeneralStateOffset & Wa32bitInstructionBaseOffset

[Chris Wilson]

On Thu, Jul 09, 2015 at 05:19:27PM +0100, Michel Thierry wrote:
> On 7/7/2015 4:15 PM, Michel Thierry wrote:
> >There are some allocations that must be only referenced by 32-bit
> >offsets. To limit the chances of having the first 4GB already full,
> >objects not requiring this workaround use DRM_MM_SEARCH_BELOW/
> >DRM_MM_CREATE_TOP flags
> >
> >In specific, any resource used with flat/heapless (0x00000000-0xfffff000)
> >General State Heap (GSH) or Intructions State Heap (ISH) must be in a
> >32-bit range, because the General State Offset and Instruction State
> >Offset are limited to 32-bits.
> >
> >Objects must have EXEC_OBJECT_SUPPORTS_48B_ADDRESS flag to indicate if
> >they can be allocated above the 32-bit address range. To limit the
> >chances of having the first 4GB already full, objects will use
> >DRM_MM_SEARCH_BELOW + DRM_MM_CREATE_TOP flags when possible.
> >
> >v2: Changed flag logic from neeeds_32b, to supports_48b.
> >v3: Moved 48-bit support flag back to exec_object. (Chris, Daniel)
> >v4: Split pin flags into PIN_ZONE_4G and PIN_HIGH; update PIN_OFFSET_MASK
> >to use last PIN_ defined instead of hard-coded value; use correct limit
> >check in eb_vma_misplaced. (Chris)
> >v5: Don't touch PIN_OFFSET_MASK and update workaround comment (Chris)
> >
> >Cc: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
> >Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk> (v4)
> >Signed-off-by: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry at intel.com>
> >---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h            |  2 ++
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c            | 14 ++++++++++++--
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c | 13 +++++++++++++
> >  include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h                |  3 ++-
> >  4 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> >diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> >index 4a30a73..fc88e58 100644
> >--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> >+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> >@@ -2772,6 +2772,8 @@ void i915_gem_vma_destroy(struct i915_vma *vma);
> >  #define PIN_OFFSET_BIAS        (1<<3)
> >  #define PIN_USER       (1<<4)
> >  #define PIN_UPDATE     (1<<5)
> >+#define PIN_ZONE_4G    (1<<6)
> >+#define PIN_HIGH       (1<<7)
> >  #define PIN_OFFSET_MASK (~4095)
> >  int __must_check
> >  i915_gem_object_pin(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
> >diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> >index ebfb789..b13900d 100644
> >--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> >+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> >@@ -3720,6 +3720,8 @@ i915_gem_object_bind_to_vm(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
> >         struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
> >         u32 fence_alignment, unfenced_alignment;
> >         u64 size, fence_size;
> >+       u32 search_flag = DRM_MM_SEARCH_DEFAULT;
> >+       u32 alloc_flag = DRM_MM_CREATE_DEFAULT;
> >         u64 start =
> >                 flags & PIN_OFFSET_BIAS ? flags & PIN_OFFSET_MASK : 0;
> >         u64 end =
> >@@ -3761,6 +3763,14 @@ i915_gem_object_bind_to_vm(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
> >                                                    obj->tiling_mode,
> >                                                    false);
> >                 size = flags & PIN_MAPPABLE ? fence_size : obj->base.size;
> >+
> >+               if (flags & PIN_HIGH) {
> >+                       search_flag = DRM_MM_SEARCH_BELOW;
> >+                       alloc_flag = DRM_MM_CREATE_TOP;
> >+               }
> >+
> >+               if (flags & PIN_ZONE_4G)
> >+                       end = (1ULL << 32);
> Hi Chris,
> second thoughts on this... would PIN_HIGH & PIN_ZONE_4G be a problem
> if someone mixes a 64-bit kernel with 32-bit userland?
> Maybe it's safer to set end = (1ULL << 32) - PAGE_SIZE.

No, the uapi is and always has been u64. To be paranoid, you would have
to presume anything above INT_MAX is going to be trouble.
-Chris

-- 
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre