[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] tests/gem_exec_lut_handle

[Daniel Vetter]

On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 11:19:46AM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 11:19:32AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > Reduce default number of repeats a lot. High repeat count is only
> > useful for microbenchmarking, not that much for regression testing.
> > 
> > Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=87131
> 
> This just to hide the regression that exec got a lot slower?

Well 10% or so afaik. But in general I think we need to grow more smarts
so that microbenchmarks don't chew too much cpu time. Eventually I'd like
to integrate them somehow in our performance testing in a new igt mode or
something like that ...

And I haven't seen a lot of activity to track down the reloc regression
itself.
-Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch