[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] tests/gem_exec_lut_handle

Chris Wilson chris at chris-wilson.co.uk
Wed Mar 18 07:53:58 PDT 2015


On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 02:50:43PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> And I haven't seen a lot of activity to track down the reloc regression
> itself.

The cause was obvious. The essence is the multiple redundant atomic
operations added to execbuffer.
-Chris

-- 
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre


More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list