[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 00/12] All sort of cdclk stuff
Damien Lespiau
damien.lespiau at intel.com
Thu May 28 10:28:47 PDT 2015
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 08:17:35PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Thu, 28 May 2015, Daniel Vetter <daniel at ffwll.ch> wrote:
> > On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 04:29:10PM +0100, Damien Lespiau wrote:
> >> On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 02:49:38PM -0700, Joe Konno wrote:
> >> > Do we have an idea when this patch series will be reviewed? Customers
> >> > are awaiting for this to be merged to the drm-intel fd.o repository.
> >>
> >> This series is mostly reviewed, all but one patch the HSW CDCLK code.
> >> I'm not sure that we want to enable that on HSW as AFAIK changing CDCLK
> >> hasn't been validated on that platform.
> >>
> >> Next step is for Mika to resend the series with jani's comments I
> >> believe?
> >
> > Yeah.
> >
> > The other thing I realized (and the reason I didn't realize that most here
> > is reviewed) is that the r-b tags magically appeared when resending and
> > there seems to never have been a review on the m-l. I don't like when that
> > kind of backroom review happens, since it excludes everyone else. Besides
> > that I'll simply not noticed it has happened ...
>
> Well, as I mentioned, Mika should've added his Signed-off-by, not
> Reviewed-by, when picking up where Ville left off. I'm not sure if much
> further review is necessary if the patches have gone through two
> developers. So I don't think it's as bad as you imply.
Oh, you mean those were supposed to be sob tags and not r-b tags?
--
Damien
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list