[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 25/31] drm/i915: Send TP1 TP2/3 even when panel claims no NO_TRAIN_ON_EXIT.
Rodrigo Vivi
rodrigo.vivi at intel.com
Thu Nov 5 10:50:17 PST 2015
On the commit 3301d4092106 ("drm/i915: PSR: Fix DP_PSR_NO_TRAIN_ON_EXIT logic")'
we already had identified that DP_PSR_NO_TRAIN_ON_EXIT
doesn't mean we shouldn't send TPS patterns, however we start sending the
minimal TP1 as possible and no TP2.
For most of the panels this is ok, but we found a reported case where
this is not true and panel keeps frozen without updating the screen for a while.
We could just get this case after patch "PSR: Don't Skip aux handshake on
DP_PSR_NO_TRAIN_ON_EXIT." is applied since that one fix the
hard freeze on this kind of panels.
Reference: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91436#c19
Cc: Ivan Mitev <ivan.mitev at gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi at intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c | 4 ----
1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
index 4e88e2e..ee426ea 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
@@ -259,10 +259,6 @@ static void hsw_psr_enable_source(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
const uint32_t link_entry_time = EDP_PSR_MIN_LINK_ENTRY_TIME_8_LINES;
if (intel_dp->psr_dpcd[1] & DP_PSR_NO_TRAIN_ON_EXIT) {
- /* It doesn't mean we shouldn't send TPS patters, so let's
- send the minimal TP1 possible and skip TP2. */
- val |= EDP_PSR_TP1_TIME_100us;
- val |= EDP_PSR_TP2_TP3_TIME_0us;
/* Sink should be able to train with the 5 or 6 idle patterns */
idle_frames += 4;
}
--
2.4.3
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list