[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 04/29] drm/i915: Parametrize AUX registers

[Ville Syrjälä]

On Fri, Nov 06, 2015 at 01:25:19PM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 04, 2015 at 11:19:52PM +0200, ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com wrote:
> > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
> > 
> > v2: Keep some MISSING_CASE() stuff (Jani)
> >     s/-1/-PIPE_B/ in the register macro
> >     Fix typo in patch subject
> > v3: Use PORT_B registers for invalid ports in g4x_aux_ctl_reg() (Jani)
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula at intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
> > ---
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> > index 62fb95c..2638a60 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> > @@ -751,7 +751,7 @@ static uint32_t i9xx_get_aux_send_ctl(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> >  	else
> >  		precharge = 5;
> >  
> > -	if (IS_BROADWELL(dev) && intel_dp->aux_ch_ctl_reg == DPA_AUX_CH_CTL)
> > +	if (IS_BROADWELL(dev) && intel_dp->aux_ch_ctl_reg == DP_AUX_CH_CTL(PORT_A))
> 
> Didn't this change to intel_dp->port == PORT_A at some point? Would that
> be worth doing earlier?

Hmm. Yeah reordering would reduce the churn a bit. I'll do that.

I did reorder the patches after I had written them to group things
a bit better, but clearly I could have picked an even better order.
 
> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
> -Chris
> 
> -- 
> Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC