[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] igt/kms_rotation_crc: Add a subtest to validate Y-tiled obj + Y fb modifier
Tvrtko Ursulin
tvrtko.ursulin at linux.intel.com
Mon Oct 19 03:20:05 PDT 2015
Hi,
On 17/10/15 03:47, Vivek Kasireddy wrote:
> The main goal of this subtest is to verify whether flipping a
> framebuffer with a Y fb modifier (90/270 degree rotation) and
> an associated Y-tiled object works or not.
>
> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Vivek Kasireddy <vivek.kasireddy at intel.com>
> ---
> tests/kms_rotation_crc.c | 83 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 83 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tests/kms_rotation_crc.c b/tests/kms_rotation_crc.c
> index cc9847e..bb9aecb 100644
> --- a/tests/kms_rotation_crc.c
> +++ b/tests/kms_rotation_crc.c
> @@ -264,6 +264,83 @@ static void test_plane_rotation(data_t *data, enum igt_plane plane_type)
> igt_require_f(valid_tests, "no valid crtc/connector combinations found\n");
> }
>
> +static void test_plane_rotation_ytiled_obj(data_t *data, enum igt_plane plane_type)
> +{
> + igt_display_t *display = &data->display;
> + uint64_t tiling = LOCAL_I915_FORMAT_MOD_Y_TILED;
> + uint32_t format = DRM_FORMAT_XRGB8888;
> + int bpp = igt_drm_format_to_bpp(format);
> + enum igt_commit_style commit = COMMIT_LEGACY;
> + int fd = data->gfx_fd;
> + int valid_tests = 0;
> + igt_output_t *output;
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (plane_type == IGT_PLANE_PRIMARY || plane_type == IGT_PLANE_CURSOR) {
> + igt_require(data->display.has_universal_planes);
> + commit = COMMIT_UNIVERSAL;
> + }
> +
> + for_each_connected_output(display, output) {
> + igt_plane_t *plane;
> + drmModeModeInfo *mode = igt_output_get_mode(output);
> + unsigned int w = mode->hdisplay;
> + unsigned int h = mode->vdisplay;
> + unsigned int stride, size;
> + uint32_t gem_handle;
> +
> + for (stride = 512; stride < (w * bpp / 8); stride *= 2)
> + ;
> + for (size = 1024*1024; size < stride * h; size *= 2)
> + ;
> +
> + gem_handle = gem_create(fd, size);
> + ret = __gem_set_tiling(fd, gem_handle, I915_TILING_Y, stride);
> + igt_assert(ret == 0);
> +
> + do_or_die(__kms_addfb(fd, gem_handle, w, h, stride,
> + format, tiling, LOCAL_DRM_MODE_FB_MODIFIERS,
> + &data->fb.fb_id));
> +
> + data->fb.width = w;
> + data->fb.height = h;
> + data->fb.gem_handle = gem_handle;
> + data->fb.stride = stride;
> + data->fb.size = size;
> + data->fb.tiling = tiling;
> + data->fb.drm_format = format;
> +
> + plane = igt_output_get_plane(output, plane_type);
> + igt_require(igt_plane_supports_rotation(plane));
> +
> + igt_plane_set_fb(plane, NULL);
> + igt_display_commit(display);
> +
> + igt_plane_set_rotation(plane, data->rotation);
> + paint_squares(data, mode, IGT_ROTATION_0, plane);
> + igt_plane_set_fb(plane, &data->fb);
> +
> + drmModeObjectSetProperty(fd, plane->drm_plane->plane_id,
> + DRM_MODE_OBJECT_PLANE,
> + plane->rotation_property,
> + plane->rotation);
> + ret = igt_display_try_commit2(display, commit);
> + igt_assert(ret == 0);
This manages to trigger the WARN? How come since paint_squares above
will have created the normal VMA?
Regards,
Tvrtko
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list