[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] igt/kms_rotation_crc: Add a subtest to validate Y-tiled obj + Y fb modifier

Vivek Kasireddy vivek.kasireddy at intel.com
Mon Oct 19 18:14:38 PDT 2015


Hi Tvrtko,

On Mon, 19 Oct 2015 11:20:05 +0100
Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at linux.intel.com> wrote:

> 
> Hi,
> 
> On 17/10/15 03:47, Vivek Kasireddy wrote:
> > The main goal of this subtest is to verify whether flipping a
> > framebuffer with a Y fb modifier (90/270 degree rotation) and
> > an associated Y-tiled object works or not.
> >
> > Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Vivek Kasireddy <vivek.kasireddy at intel.com>
> > ---
> >   tests/kms_rotation_crc.c | 83
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 83
> > insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/tests/kms_rotation_crc.c b/tests/kms_rotation_crc.c
> > index cc9847e..bb9aecb 100644
> > --- a/tests/kms_rotation_crc.c
> > +++ b/tests/kms_rotation_crc.c
> > @@ -264,6 +264,83 @@ static void test_plane_rotation(data_t *data,
> > enum igt_plane plane_type) igt_require_f(valid_tests, "no valid
> > crtc/connector combinations found\n"); }
> >
> > +static void test_plane_rotation_ytiled_obj(data_t *data, enum
> > igt_plane plane_type) +{
> > +	igt_display_t *display = &data->display;
> > +	uint64_t tiling = LOCAL_I915_FORMAT_MOD_Y_TILED;
> > +	uint32_t format = DRM_FORMAT_XRGB8888;
> > +	int bpp = igt_drm_format_to_bpp(format);
> > +	enum igt_commit_style commit = COMMIT_LEGACY;
> > +	int fd = data->gfx_fd;
> > +	int valid_tests = 0;
> > +	igt_output_t *output;
> > +	int ret;
> > +
> > +	if (plane_type == IGT_PLANE_PRIMARY || plane_type ==
> > IGT_PLANE_CURSOR) {
> > +		igt_require(data->display.has_universal_planes);
> > +		commit = COMMIT_UNIVERSAL;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	for_each_connected_output(display, output) {
> > +		igt_plane_t *plane;
> > +		drmModeModeInfo *mode =
> > igt_output_get_mode(output);
> > +		unsigned int w = mode->hdisplay;
> > +		unsigned int h = mode->vdisplay;
> > +		unsigned int stride, size;
> > +		uint32_t gem_handle;
> > +
> > +		for (stride = 512; stride < (w * bpp / 8); stride
> > *= 2)
> > +			;
> > +		for (size = 1024*1024; size < stride * h; size *=
> > 2)
> > +			;
> > +
> > +		gem_handle = gem_create(fd, size);
> > +		ret = __gem_set_tiling(fd, gem_handle,
> > I915_TILING_Y, stride);
> > +		igt_assert(ret == 0);
> > +
> > +		do_or_die(__kms_addfb(fd, gem_handle, w, h, stride,
> > +			  format, tiling,
> > LOCAL_DRM_MODE_FB_MODIFIERS,
> > +			  &data->fb.fb_id));
> > +
> > +		data->fb.width = w;
> > +		data->fb.height = h;
> > +		data->fb.gem_handle = gem_handle;
> > +		data->fb.stride = stride;
> > +		data->fb.size = size;
> > +		data->fb.tiling = tiling;
> > +		data->fb.drm_format = format;
> > +
> > +		plane = igt_output_get_plane(output, plane_type);
> > +		igt_require(igt_plane_supports_rotation(plane));
> > +
> > +		igt_plane_set_fb(plane, NULL);
> > +		igt_display_commit(display);
> > +
> > +		igt_plane_set_rotation(plane, data->rotation);
> > +		paint_squares(data, mode, IGT_ROTATION_0, plane);
> > +		igt_plane_set_fb(plane, &data->fb);
> > +
> > +		drmModeObjectSetProperty(fd,
> > plane->drm_plane->plane_id,
> > +					 DRM_MODE_OBJECT_PLANE,
> > +					 plane->rotation_property,
> > +					 plane->rotation);
> > +		ret = igt_display_try_commit2(display, commit);
> > +		igt_assert(ret == 0);
> 
> This manages to trigger the WARN? How come since paint_squares above 
> will have created the normal VMA?

Yes, this does trigger the WARN regardless of whether paint_squares is
called or not. I am going to have to find out why the normal VMA was
not created when paint_squares was called. And, this subtest does not
restore the console cleanly which is something I also have to fix.


Thanks,
Vivek

> 
> Regards,
> 
> Tvrtko



More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list