[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] igt/kms_rotation_crc: Add a subtest to validate Y-tiled obj + Y fb modifier
Vivek Kasireddy
vivek.kasireddy at intel.com
Mon Oct 19 18:14:38 PDT 2015
Hi Tvrtko,
On Mon, 19 Oct 2015 11:20:05 +0100
Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at linux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On 17/10/15 03:47, Vivek Kasireddy wrote:
> > The main goal of this subtest is to verify whether flipping a
> > framebuffer with a Y fb modifier (90/270 degree rotation) and
> > an associated Y-tiled object works or not.
> >
> > Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Vivek Kasireddy <vivek.kasireddy at intel.com>
> > ---
> > tests/kms_rotation_crc.c | 83
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 83
> > insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/tests/kms_rotation_crc.c b/tests/kms_rotation_crc.c
> > index cc9847e..bb9aecb 100644
> > --- a/tests/kms_rotation_crc.c
> > +++ b/tests/kms_rotation_crc.c
> > @@ -264,6 +264,83 @@ static void test_plane_rotation(data_t *data,
> > enum igt_plane plane_type) igt_require_f(valid_tests, "no valid
> > crtc/connector combinations found\n"); }
> >
> > +static void test_plane_rotation_ytiled_obj(data_t *data, enum
> > igt_plane plane_type) +{
> > + igt_display_t *display = &data->display;
> > + uint64_t tiling = LOCAL_I915_FORMAT_MOD_Y_TILED;
> > + uint32_t format = DRM_FORMAT_XRGB8888;
> > + int bpp = igt_drm_format_to_bpp(format);
> > + enum igt_commit_style commit = COMMIT_LEGACY;
> > + int fd = data->gfx_fd;
> > + int valid_tests = 0;
> > + igt_output_t *output;
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + if (plane_type == IGT_PLANE_PRIMARY || plane_type ==
> > IGT_PLANE_CURSOR) {
> > + igt_require(data->display.has_universal_planes);
> > + commit = COMMIT_UNIVERSAL;
> > + }
> > +
> > + for_each_connected_output(display, output) {
> > + igt_plane_t *plane;
> > + drmModeModeInfo *mode =
> > igt_output_get_mode(output);
> > + unsigned int w = mode->hdisplay;
> > + unsigned int h = mode->vdisplay;
> > + unsigned int stride, size;
> > + uint32_t gem_handle;
> > +
> > + for (stride = 512; stride < (w * bpp / 8); stride
> > *= 2)
> > + ;
> > + for (size = 1024*1024; size < stride * h; size *=
> > 2)
> > + ;
> > +
> > + gem_handle = gem_create(fd, size);
> > + ret = __gem_set_tiling(fd, gem_handle,
> > I915_TILING_Y, stride);
> > + igt_assert(ret == 0);
> > +
> > + do_or_die(__kms_addfb(fd, gem_handle, w, h, stride,
> > + format, tiling,
> > LOCAL_DRM_MODE_FB_MODIFIERS,
> > + &data->fb.fb_id));
> > +
> > + data->fb.width = w;
> > + data->fb.height = h;
> > + data->fb.gem_handle = gem_handle;
> > + data->fb.stride = stride;
> > + data->fb.size = size;
> > + data->fb.tiling = tiling;
> > + data->fb.drm_format = format;
> > +
> > + plane = igt_output_get_plane(output, plane_type);
> > + igt_require(igt_plane_supports_rotation(plane));
> > +
> > + igt_plane_set_fb(plane, NULL);
> > + igt_display_commit(display);
> > +
> > + igt_plane_set_rotation(plane, data->rotation);
> > + paint_squares(data, mode, IGT_ROTATION_0, plane);
> > + igt_plane_set_fb(plane, &data->fb);
> > +
> > + drmModeObjectSetProperty(fd,
> > plane->drm_plane->plane_id,
> > + DRM_MODE_OBJECT_PLANE,
> > + plane->rotation_property,
> > + plane->rotation);
> > + ret = igt_display_try_commit2(display, commit);
> > + igt_assert(ret == 0);
>
> This manages to trigger the WARN? How come since paint_squares above
> will have created the normal VMA?
Yes, this does trigger the WARN regardless of whether paint_squares is
called or not. I am going to have to find out why the normal VMA was
not created when paint_squares was called. And, this subtest does not
restore the console cleanly which is something I also have to fix.
Thanks,
Vivek
>
> Regards,
>
> Tvrtko
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list