[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 07/10] drm/i915: Undiplicate VLV signal level code

Jim Bride jim.bride at linux.intel.com
Tue Apr 19 20:45:46 UTC 2016


On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 01:37:26PM -0700, Jim Bride wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 08:47:50PM +0300, Ander Conselvan de Oliveira wrote:

Same typo in this patch's subject ('Undiplicate') as the previous one.

Jim


> > The logic for setting signal levels is used for both HDMI and DP with
> > small variations. But it is similar enough to put behind a function
> > called from the encoders.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Ander Conselvan de Oliveira <ander.conselvan.de.oliveira at intel.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h       |  4 ++++
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c       | 43 ++++++++++++-----------------------
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpio_phy.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_hdmi.c     | 14 ++++--------
> >  4 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> > index 85c0610..f2481a2 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> > @@ -3565,6 +3565,10 @@ void chv_phy_pre_encoder_enable(struct intel_encoder *encoder);
> >  void chv_phy_release_cl2_override(struct intel_encoder *encoder);
> >  void chv_phy_post_disable(struct intel_encoder *encoder);
> >  
> > +void vlv_set_phy_signal_level(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
> > +			      u32 demph_reg_value, u32 preemph_reg_value,
> > +			      u32 uniqtranscale_reg_value, u32 tx3_demph);
> > +
> >  int intel_gpu_freq(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, int val);
> >  int intel_freq_opcode(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, int val);
> >  
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> > index cdacd8b..3e42355 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> > @@ -3009,16 +3009,10 @@ intel_dp_pre_emphasis_max(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, uint8_t voltage_swing)
> >  
> >  static uint32_t vlv_signal_levels(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> >  {
> > -	struct drm_device *dev = intel_dp_to_dev(intel_dp);
> > -	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
> > -	struct intel_digital_port *dport = dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp);
> > -	struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc =
> > -		to_intel_crtc(dport->base.base.crtc);
> > +	struct intel_encoder *encoder = &dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp)->base;
> >  	unsigned long demph_reg_value, preemph_reg_value,
> >  		uniqtranscale_reg_value;
> >  	uint8_t train_set = intel_dp->train_set[0];
> > -	enum dpio_channel port = vlv_dport_to_channel(dport);
> > -	int pipe = intel_crtc->pipe;
> >  
> >  	switch (train_set & DP_TRAIN_PRE_EMPHASIS_MASK) {
> >  	case DP_TRAIN_PRE_EMPH_LEVEL_0:
> > @@ -3093,16 +3087,8 @@ static uint32_t vlv_signal_levels(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> >  		return 0;
> >  	}
> >  
> > -	mutex_lock(&dev_priv->sb_lock);
> > -	vlv_dpio_write(dev_priv, pipe, VLV_TX_DW5(port), 0x00000000);
> > -	vlv_dpio_write(dev_priv, pipe, VLV_TX_DW4(port), demph_reg_value);
> > -	vlv_dpio_write(dev_priv, pipe, VLV_TX_DW2(port),
> > -			 uniqtranscale_reg_value);
> > -	vlv_dpio_write(dev_priv, pipe, VLV_TX_DW3(port), 0x0C782040);
> > -	vlv_dpio_write(dev_priv, pipe, VLV_PCS_DW11(port), 0x00030000);
> > -	vlv_dpio_write(dev_priv, pipe, VLV_PCS_DW9(port), preemph_reg_value);
> > -	vlv_dpio_write(dev_priv, pipe, VLV_TX_DW5(port), 0x80000000);
> > -	mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->sb_lock);
> > +	vlv_set_phy_signal_level(encoder, demph_reg_value, preemph_reg_value,
> > +				 uniqtranscale_reg_value, 0);
> >  
> >  	return 0;
> >  }
> > @@ -4285,17 +4271,6 @@ intel_dp_long_pulse(struct intel_connector *intel_connector)
> >  		intel_dp->compliance_test_type = 0;
> >  		intel_dp->compliance_test_data = 0;
> >  
> > -		/*
> > -		 * If we were in MST mode, and device is not there,
> > -		 * get out of MST mode
> > -		 */
> > -		if (intel_dp->is_mst) {
> > -			DRM_DEBUG_KMS("MST device may have disappeared %d vs %d\n",
> > -				      intel_dp->is_mst, intel_dp->mst_mgr.mst_state);
> > -			intel_dp->is_mst = false;
> > -			drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr_set_mst(&intel_dp->mst_mgr,
> > -							intel_dp->is_mst);
> > -		}
> >  		goto out;
> >  	}
> >  
> > @@ -4355,6 +4330,18 @@ intel_dp_long_pulse(struct intel_connector *intel_connector)
> >  out:
> >  	if (status != connector_status_connected) {
> >  		intel_dp_unset_edid(intel_dp);
> > +
> > +		/*
> > +		 * If we were in MST mode, and device is not there,
> > +		 * get out of MST mode
> > +		 */
> > +		if (intel_dp->is_mst) {
> > +			DRM_DEBUG_KMS("MST device may have disappeared %d vs %d\n",
> > +				      intel_dp->is_mst, intel_dp->mst_mgr.mst_state);
> > +			intel_dp->is_mst = false;
> > +			drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr_set_mst(&intel_dp->mst_mgr,
> > +							intel_dp->is_mst);
> > +		}
> 
> The two hunks above seem unrelated to what the patch set is trying to do and
> would break DP MST again. ;)
> 
> Jim
> 
> 
> >  	}
> >  
> >  	intel_display_power_put(to_i915(dev), power_domain);
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpio_phy.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpio_phy.c
> > index 2400554..d9e6482 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpio_phy.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpio_phy.c
> > @@ -369,3 +369,29 @@ void chv_phy_post_disable(struct intel_encoder *encoder)
> >  	 */
> >  	chv_phy_powergate_lanes(encoder, false, 0x0);
> >  }
> > +
> > +void vlv_set_phy_signal_level(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
> > +			      u32 demph_reg_value, u32 preemph_reg_value,
> > +			      u32 uniqtranscale_reg_value, u32 tx3_demph)
> > +{
> > +	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(encoder->base.dev);
> > +	struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc = to_intel_crtc(encoder->base.crtc);
> > +	struct intel_digital_port *dport = enc_to_dig_port(&encoder->base);
> > +	enum dpio_channel port = vlv_dport_to_channel(dport);
> > +	int pipe = intel_crtc->pipe;
> > +
> > +	mutex_lock(&dev_priv->sb_lock);
> > +	vlv_dpio_write(dev_priv, pipe, VLV_TX_DW5(port), 0x00000000);
> > +	vlv_dpio_write(dev_priv, pipe, VLV_TX_DW4(port), demph_reg_value);
> > +	vlv_dpio_write(dev_priv, pipe, VLV_TX_DW2(port),
> > +			 uniqtranscale_reg_value);
> > +	vlv_dpio_write(dev_priv, pipe, VLV_TX_DW3(port), 0x0C782040);
> > +
> > +	if (tx3_demph)
> > +		vlv_dpio_write(dev_priv, pipe, VLV_TX3_DW4(port), tx3_demph);
> > +
> > +	vlv_dpio_write(dev_priv, pipe, VLV_PCS_DW11(port), 0x00030000);
> > +	vlv_dpio_write(dev_priv, pipe, VLV_PCS_DW9(port), preemph_reg_value);
> > +	vlv_dpio_write(dev_priv, pipe, VLV_TX_DW5(port), DPIO_TX_OCALINIT_EN);
> > +	mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->sb_lock);
> > +}
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_hdmi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_hdmi.c
> > index f424af5..9386772 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_hdmi.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_hdmi.c
> > @@ -1601,21 +1601,15 @@ static void vlv_hdmi_pre_enable(struct intel_encoder *encoder)
> >  	val |= 0x001000c4;
> >  	vlv_dpio_write(dev_priv, pipe, VLV_PCS_DW8(port), val);
> >  
> > -	/* HDMI 1.0V-2dB */
> > -	vlv_dpio_write(dev_priv, pipe, VLV_TX_DW5(port), 0);
> > -	vlv_dpio_write(dev_priv, pipe, VLV_TX_DW4(port), 0x2b245f5f);
> > -	vlv_dpio_write(dev_priv, pipe, VLV_TX_DW2(port), 0x5578b83a);
> > -	vlv_dpio_write(dev_priv, pipe, VLV_TX_DW3(port), 0x0c782040);
> > -	vlv_dpio_write(dev_priv, pipe, VLV_TX3_DW4(port), 0x2b247878);
> > -	vlv_dpio_write(dev_priv, pipe, VLV_PCS_DW11(port), 0x00030000);
> > -	vlv_dpio_write(dev_priv, pipe, VLV_PCS_DW9(port), 0x00002000);
> > -	vlv_dpio_write(dev_priv, pipe, VLV_TX_DW5(port), DPIO_TX_OCALINIT_EN);
> > -
> >  	/* Program lane clock */
> >  	vlv_dpio_write(dev_priv, pipe, VLV_PCS_DW14(port), 0x00760018);
> >  	vlv_dpio_write(dev_priv, pipe, VLV_PCS_DW23(port), 0x00400888);
> >  	mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->sb_lock);
> >  
> > +	/* HDMI 1.0V-2dB */
> > +	vlv_set_phy_signal_level(encoder, 0x2b245f5f, 0x00002000, 0x5578b83a,
> > +				 0x2b247878);
> > +
> >  	intel_hdmi->set_infoframes(&encoder->base,
> >  				   intel_crtc->config->has_hdmi_sink,
> >  				   adjusted_mode);
> > -- 
> > 2.4.11
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Intel-gfx mailing list
> > Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx


More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list