[Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 1/2] lib/igt_aux: Half the timeout for suspend to RAM and a third for suspend to disk.

[Tomi Sarvela]

Fi CI has ran with this patch approx 2 weeks at January.

All platforms acted the same with or without patch.

Tomi


On Wednesday 20 April 2016 20:49:56 Marius Vlad wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Marius Vlad <marius.c.vlad at intel.com>
> ---
>  lib/igt_aux.c | 8 ++++----
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/lib/igt_aux.c b/lib/igt_aux.c
> index c32569f..fe18365 100644
> --- a/lib/igt_aux.c
> +++ b/lib/igt_aux.c
> @@ -671,9 +671,9 @@ void igt_system_suspend_autoresume(void)
>  	igt_skip_on_simulation();
> 
>  	/* skip if system doesn't support suspend-to-mem */
> -	igt_require(system("rtcwake -n -s 30 -m mem" SQUELCH) == 0);
> +	igt_require(system("rtcwake -n -s 15 -m mem" SQUELCH) == 0);
> 
> -	igt_assert_f(system("rtcwake -s 30 -m mem") == 0,
> +	igt_assert_f(system("rtcwake -s 15 -m mem") == 0,
>  		     "This failure means that something is wrong with the "
>  		     "rtcwake tool or how your distro is set up. This is not "
>  		     "a i915.ko or i-g-t bug.\n");
> @@ -698,12 +698,12 @@ void igt_system_hibernate_autoresume(void)
>  	igt_skip_on_simulation();
> 
>  	/* skip if system doesn't support suspend-to-disk */
> -	igt_require(system("rtcwake -n -s 90 -m disk" SQUELCH) == 0);
> +	igt_require(system("rtcwake -n -s 30 -m disk" SQUELCH) == 0);
> 
>  	/* The timeout might need to be adjusted if hibernation takes too long
>  	 * or if we have to wait excessively long before resume
>  	 */
> -	igt_assert_f(system("rtcwake -s 90 -m disk") == 0,
> +	igt_assert_f(system("rtcwake -s 30 -m disk") == 0,
>  		     "This failure means that something is wrong with the "
>  		     "rtcwake tool or how your distro is set up. This is not "
>  		     "a i915.ko or i-g-t bug.\n");