[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/4] drm: Protect master->unique with dev->master_mutex

[Daniel Vetter]

On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 01:23:46PM +0000, Emil Velikov wrote:
> On 10 December 2016 at 21:52, Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch> wrote:
> > No one looks at the major/minor versions except the unique/busid
> > stuff. If we protect that with the master_mutex (since it also affects
> > the unique of each master, oh well) we can mark these two IOCTL with
> > DRM_UNLOCKED.
> >
> > While doing this I realized that the comment for the magic_map is
> > outdated, I've forgotten to update it in:
> >
> > commit d2b34ee62b409a03c6fe43c07b779983be51d017
> > Author: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch>
> > Date:   Fri Jun 17 09:33:21 2016 +0200
> >
> >     drm: Protect authmagic with master_mutex
> >
> > Cc: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
> > Cc: Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov at gmail.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov at gmail.com>
> 
> Side note: I've looked at "fixing" xf86-video-amdgpu and so far I'm at
> ~25 patches. Admittedly it includes some related fixes/cleanups.
> At some point we want to address the other KMS ddx - armsoc (ahem),
> ati, freedreno, intel, nouveau, omap, opentegra, vmwgfx, qxl and of
> course modesetting ;-)
> Regardless if some are superseded and/or barely used.

Hm, I thought the grand plan is to use -modesetting almost everywhere and
forget about all the others?
-Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch