[Intel-gfx] ??? Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915: relax uncritical udelay_range() settings

[Jani Nikula]

On Fri, 16 Dec 2016, Nicholas Mc Guire <der.herr at hofr.at> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 07:29:59AM +0000, Saarinen, Jani wrote:
>> > == Series Details ==
>> > 
>> > Series: drm/i915: relax uncritical udelay_range() settings
>> > URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/16900/
>> > State : failure
>> > 
>> > == Summary ==
>> > 
>> > Series 16900v1 drm/i915: relax uncritical udelay_range() settings
>> > https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/16900/revisions/1/mbox/
>> > 
>> > Test gem_ringfill:
>> >         Subgroup basic-default-hang:
>> >                 pass       -> INCOMPLETE (fi-hsw-4770)
>> running: igt/gem_ringfill/basic-default-hang
>> [117/247] skip: 8, pass: 109 /              
>> Build timed out (after 17 minutes). Marking the build as aborted.
>>
> This might be a conflict caused by the initial patch which was discssed
> and then after agreeing that rather than moving to udelay() usleep:range
> with som adjustments would be the right way to go. 
> are both patches queued now ?
>
> I think I caused the problem by changing the subject line of the patch 
> while adding a V2 - because the original subject line was no longer corrct
> (it noted udely) - the V2 patch is marked as "rev 1" in patchwork though.
>  
> not quite clear - anyway sorry if I made some sort of a mess here
> the patch applies cleanly on next-20161216.

Nah, some other hickup in CI on a machine that's not affected by your
change.

Pushed to drm-intel-next-queued, thanks for the patch.

BR,
Jani.


>
> thx!
> hofrat
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center