[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 122/190] drm/i915: Move setting of request->batch into its single callsite

[Chris Wilson]

request->batch_obj is only set by execbuffer for the convenience of
debugging hangs. By moving that operation to the callsite, we can
simplify all other callers and future patches. We also move the
complications of reference handling of the request->batch_obj next to
where the active tracking is set up for the request.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c | 10 +++++++++-
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_request.c    | 12 +-----------
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_request.h    |  8 +++-----
 3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
index e66864bdbfb4..a1b6678fb075 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
@@ -1629,6 +1629,14 @@ i915_gem_do_execbuffer(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
 		goto err_batch_unpin;
 	}
 
+	/* Whilst this request exists, batch_obj will be on the
+	 * active_list, and so will hold the active reference. Only when this
+	 * request is retired will the the batch_obj be moved onto the
+	 * inactive_list and lose its active reference. Hence we do not need
+	 * to explicitly hold another reference here.
+	 */
+	params->request->batch_obj = params->batch_vma->obj;
+
 	ret = i915_gem_request_add_to_client(params->request, file);
 	if (ret) {
 		i915_gem_request_cancel(params->request);
@@ -1648,7 +1656,7 @@ i915_gem_do_execbuffer(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
 	params->ctx                     = ctx;
 
 	ret = execbuf_submit(params, args, &eb->vmas);
-	__i915_add_request(params->request, params->batch_vma->obj, ret == 0);
+	__i915_add_request(params->request, ret == 0);
 
 err_batch_unpin:
 	/*
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_request.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_request.c
index be24bde2e602..1886048f0acd 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_request.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_request.c
@@ -418,9 +418,7 @@ static void i915_gem_mark_busy(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
  * request is not being tracked for completion but the work itself is
  * going to happen on the hardware. This would be a Bad Thing(tm).
  */
-void __i915_add_request(struct drm_i915_gem_request *request,
-			struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
-			bool flush_caches)
+void __i915_add_request(struct drm_i915_gem_request *request, bool flush_caches)
 {
 	struct intel_ring *ring;
 	u32 request_start;
@@ -467,14 +465,6 @@ void __i915_add_request(struct drm_i915_gem_request *request,
 
 	request->head = request_start;
 
-	/* Whilst this request exists, batch_obj will be on the
-	 * active_list, and so will hold the active reference. Only when this
-	 * request is retired will the the batch_obj be moved onto the
-	 * inactive_list and lose its active reference. Hence we do not need
-	 * to explicitly hold another reference here.
-	 */
-	request->batch_obj = obj;
-
 	request->emitted_jiffies = jiffies;
 	request->previous_seqno = request->engine->last_submitted_seqno;
 	request->engine->last_submitted_seqno = request->fence.seqno;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_request.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_request.h
index f035db7c97cd..4b38cd731124 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_request.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_request.h
@@ -162,13 +162,11 @@ static inline void i915_gem_request_assign(struct drm_i915_gem_request **pdst,
 	*pdst = src;
 }
 
-void __i915_add_request(struct drm_i915_gem_request *req,
-			struct drm_i915_gem_object *batch_obj,
-			bool flush_caches);
+void __i915_add_request(struct drm_i915_gem_request *req, bool flush_caches);
 #define i915_add_request(req) \
-	__i915_add_request(req, NULL, true)
+	__i915_add_request(req, true)
 #define i915_add_request_no_flush(req) \
-	__i915_add_request(req, NULL, false)
+	__i915_add_request(req, false)
 
 struct intel_rps_client;
 #define NO_WAITBOOST ERR_PTR(-1)
-- 
2.7.0.rc3