[Intel-gfx] ✗ failure: Fi.CI.BAT

[Daniel Vetter]

On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 02:50:28PM +0200, Mika Kuoppala wrote:
> Patchwork <patchwork at annarchy.freedesktop.org> writes:
> 
> > == Summary ==
> >
> > Built on ff88655b3a5467bbc3be8c67d3e05ebf182557d3 drm-intel-nightly: 2016y-01m-11d-07h-30m-16s UTC integration manifest
> >
> > Test gem_storedw_loop:
> >         Subgroup basic-render:
> >                 pass       -> DMESG-WARN (skl-i5k-2) UNSTABLE
> >                 dmesg-warn -> PASS       (bdw-ultra)
> > Test kms_flip:
> >         Subgroup basic-flip-vs-dpms:
> >                 dmesg-warn -> PASS       (ilk-hp8440p)
> >         Subgroup basic-flip-vs-modeset:
> >                 pass       -> DMESG-WARN (skl-i5k-2)
> >                 dmesg-warn -> PASS       (bsw-nuc-2)
> >                 pass       -> DMESG-WARN (ilk-hp8440p)
> >                 dmesg-warn -> PASS       (byt-nuc)
> >         Subgroup basic-flip-vs-wf_vblank:
> >                 pass       -> DMESG-WARN (byt-nuc)
> >         Subgroup basic-plain-flip:
> >                 dmesg-warn -> PASS       (bsw-nuc-2)
> >                 dmesg-warn -> PASS       (byt-nuc)
> > Test kms_pipe_crc_basic:
> >         Subgroup nonblocking-crc-pipe-b:
> >                 pass       -> DMESG-WARN (byt-nuc)
> >         Subgroup nonblocking-crc-pipe-c:
> >                 pass       -> DMESG-WARN (bsw-nuc-2)
> >         Subgroup read-crc-pipe-a:
> >                 dmesg-warn -> PASS       (byt-nuc)
> >         Subgroup read-crc-pipe-b:
> >                 dmesg-warn -> PASS       (byt-nuc)
> >         Subgroup read-crc-pipe-b-frame-sequence:
> >                 pass       -> DMESG-WARN (bdw-ultra)
> >                 dmesg-warn -> PASS       (byt-nuc)
> >         Subgroup read-crc-pipe-c:
> >                 dmesg-warn -> PASS       (bsw-nuc-2)
> >         Subgroup read-crc-pipe-c-frame-sequence:
> >                 pass       -> DMESG-WARN (bsw-nuc-2)

But what with all the pass->dmesg-warn changes above? That's considered
BAT failure too, we can't afford to sprinkle warnings all over ... And
it's a bunch of different machines.

> > Test pm_rpm:
> >         Subgroup basic-pci-d3-state:
> >                 dmesg-warn -> PASS       (byt-nuc)
> >
> > bdw-ultra        total:138  pass:130  dwarn:1   dfail:0   fail:1
> > skip:6
> 
> Tomi suspected this as a fluke fail. There was no igt stdout nor stderr
> for this case. We did a rerun and bdw-ultra passed.
> 
> -Mika
> 
> > bsw-nuc-2        total:141  pass:115  dwarn:2   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:24 
> > byt-nuc          total:141  pass:122  dwarn:4   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:15 
> > hsw-brixbox      total:141  pass:134  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:7  
> > hsw-gt2          total:141  pass:137  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:4  
> > ilk-hp8440p      total:141  pass:100  dwarn:4   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:37 
> > skl-i5k-2        total:141  pass:130  dwarn:3   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:8  
> > skl-i7k-2        total:141  pass:131  dwarn:2   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:8  
> > snb-dellxps      total:141  pass:122  dwarn:5   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:14 
> > snb-x220t        total:141  pass:122  dwarn:5   dfail:0   fail:1   skip:13 
> >
> > HANGED ivb-t430s in igt at kms_pipe_crc_basic@nonblocking-crc-pipe-b

So is killing a machine ... pretty sure this is new-ish.
-Daniel


> >
> > Results at /archive/results/CI_IGT_test/Patchwork_1116/
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch