[Intel-gfx] ✗ failure: Fi.CI.BAT

[Mika Kuoppala]

Daniel Vetter <daniel at ffwll.ch> writes:

> On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 02:50:28PM +0200, Mika Kuoppala wrote:
>> Patchwork <patchwork at annarchy.freedesktop.org> writes:
>> 
>> > == Summary ==
>> >
>> > Built on ff88655b3a5467bbc3be8c67d3e05ebf182557d3 drm-intel-nightly: 2016y-01m-11d-07h-30m-16s UTC integration manifest
>> >
>> > Test gem_storedw_loop:
>> >         Subgroup basic-render:
>> >                 pass       -> DMESG-WARN (skl-i5k-2) UNSTABLE
>> >                 dmesg-warn -> PASS       (bdw-ultra)
>> > Test kms_flip:
>> >         Subgroup basic-flip-vs-dpms:
>> >                 dmesg-warn -> PASS       (ilk-hp8440p)
>> >         Subgroup basic-flip-vs-modeset:
>> >                 pass       -> DMESG-WARN (skl-i5k-2)
>> >                 dmesg-warn -> PASS       (bsw-nuc-2)
>> >                 pass       -> DMESG-WARN (ilk-hp8440p)
>> >                 dmesg-warn -> PASS       (byt-nuc)
>> >         Subgroup basic-flip-vs-wf_vblank:
>> >                 pass       -> DMESG-WARN (byt-nuc)
>> >         Subgroup basic-plain-flip:
>> >                 dmesg-warn -> PASS       (bsw-nuc-2)
>> >                 dmesg-warn -> PASS       (byt-nuc)
>> > Test kms_pipe_crc_basic:
>> >         Subgroup nonblocking-crc-pipe-b:
>> >                 pass       -> DMESG-WARN (byt-nuc)
>> >         Subgroup nonblocking-crc-pipe-c:
>> >                 pass       -> DMESG-WARN (bsw-nuc-2)
>> >         Subgroup read-crc-pipe-a:
>> >                 dmesg-warn -> PASS       (byt-nuc)
>> >         Subgroup read-crc-pipe-b:
>> >                 dmesg-warn -> PASS       (byt-nuc)
>> >         Subgroup read-crc-pipe-b-frame-sequence:
>> >                 pass       -> DMESG-WARN (bdw-ultra)
>> >                 dmesg-warn -> PASS       (byt-nuc)
>> >         Subgroup read-crc-pipe-c:
>> >                 dmesg-warn -> PASS       (bsw-nuc-2)
>> >         Subgroup read-crc-pipe-c-frame-sequence:
>> >                 pass       -> DMESG-WARN (bsw-nuc-2)
>
> But what with all the pass->dmesg-warn changes above? That's considered
> BAT failure too, we can't afford to sprinkle warnings all over ... And
> it's a bunch of different machines.
>
>> > Test pm_rpm:
>> >         Subgroup basic-pci-d3-state:
>> >                 dmesg-warn -> PASS       (byt-nuc)
>> >
>> > bdw-ultra        total:138  pass:130  dwarn:1   dfail:0   fail:1
>> > skip:6
>> 
>> Tomi suspected this as a fluke fail. There was no igt stdout nor stderr
>> for this case. We did a rerun and bdw-ultra passed.
>> 
>> -Mika
>> 
>> > bsw-nuc-2        total:141  pass:115  dwarn:2   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:24 
>> > byt-nuc          total:141  pass:122  dwarn:4   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:15 
>> > hsw-brixbox      total:141  pass:134  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:7  
>> > hsw-gt2          total:141  pass:137  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:4  
>> > ilk-hp8440p      total:141  pass:100  dwarn:4   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:37 
>> > skl-i5k-2        total:141  pass:130  dwarn:3   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:8  
>> > skl-i7k-2        total:141  pass:131  dwarn:2   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:8  
>> > snb-dellxps      total:141  pass:122  dwarn:5   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:14 
>> > snb-x220t        total:141  pass:122  dwarn:5   dfail:0   fail:1   skip:13 
>> >
>> > HANGED ivb-t430s in igt at kms_pipe_crc_basic@nonblocking-crc-pipe-b
>
> So is killing a machine ... pretty sure this is new-ish.
> -Daniel
>

I did cover my back with this one. This happened on other sets
on the same day and I went and asked Tomi. He said that don't
worry about it. So I didn't.

-Mika

>
>> >
>> > Results at /archive/results/CI_IGT_test/Patchwork_1116/
>> _______________________________________________
>> Intel-gfx mailing list
>> Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
>> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
>
> -- 
> Daniel Vetter
> Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
> http://blog.ffwll.ch