[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 7/7] drm/i915: GEM operations need to be done under the big lock
tvrtko.ursulin at linux.intel.com
Wed Jan 13 04:46:39 PST 2016
On 11/01/16 16:56, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 05:36:46PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 03:16:16PM +0000, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>>> Don't know, I leave this one to whoever grabbed the lock around
>>> intel_init_gt_powersave in the first place. Maybe there was a special
>>> reason.. after git blame od intel_display.c eventually completed, adding
>>> Imre and Ville to cc.
>> Hmm. I don't recall the details anymore, but looking at the code pushing
>> the locking down to valleyview_setup_pctx() looks entirely reasonable to
> iirc, this locking only exists to keep the WARN() at bay. But it is
> pedagogical, I guess.
Don't really know this area, but what about the
which dereferences the dev_priv->vlv_pctx, which is set/cleared in
valleyview_setup_pctx/valleyview_cleanup_pctx, which would now be
outside both struct_mutex and the rps lock?
More information about the Intel-gfx