[Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] tests: make color management tests part of the BAT

[Lionel Landwerlin]

On 19/07/16 13:49, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 01:21:23PM +0100, Lionel Landwerlin wrote:
>> On 19/07/16 12:42, Chris Wilson wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 08:48:11AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>>>> On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 03:00:59PM +0100, Lionel Landwerlin wrote:
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin at intel.com>
>>>> Do we have the time for those in the BAT budget?
>>> Do we not? It has been demonstrated that people notice when gamma is
>>> broken, can we afford to risk repeating this bug?
>>>
>>> (Or in other news, where are all the new QA bugs from failing tests?
>>> Seems like we are missing some bug reports from igt added to show off
>>> bugs.)
>>> -Chris
>>>
>> It's about 35s to run this test :
>> real    0m34.352s
>> user    0m0.972s
>> sys    0m1.626s
>>
>> Knowing that we repeat the same tests across different pipes (so for
>> it would only take a third of that time if we were to just test pipe
>> A).
> If one test is likely to catch 99.999% of the bugs, then just add that
> one test to bat.
>   
>> I don't have a sense of the budget, is that too much already?
> Oh, we've overshot the budget by 200%. Deciding which tests are more
> important than others, or whether that budget is unrealistic requires
> holistic knowledge i.e. our maintainer overlords.
> -Chris
>
Right,


Let me resend a patch for just pipe-A then.

I haven't seen failures on one pipe but not the other.


-

Lionel