[Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] tests: make color management tests part of the BAT
Daniel Vetter
daniel at ffwll.ch
Tue Jul 19 14:32:09 UTC 2016
On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 12:42:36PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 08:48:11AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 03:00:59PM +0100, Lionel Landwerlin wrote:
> > > Signed-off-by: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin at intel.com>
> >
> > Do we have the time for those in the BAT budget?
>
> Do we not? It has been demonstrated that people notice when gamma is
> broken, can we afford to risk repeating this bug?
>
> (Or in other news, where are all the new QA bugs from failing tests?
> Seems like we are missing some bug reports from igt added to show off
> bugs.)
We don't run enough test, don't report the bugs we do catch and don't
handle it. It's all sad, but unfortunately just piling even more onto the
BAT pile is not going to help anyone - as is the results are already
pretty close to useless. The idea behind BAT really is that it runs real
fast, and that it's a gate for a more extended testcase. If we add tests
until it's real slow and still broken, no one wins at all.
Unfortunately I can't tell you how to get out of this mess either :(
-Daniel
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list