[Intel-gfx] ✗ Ro.CI.BAT: warning for drm/i915: Check VBT for port presence in addition to the strap on VLV/CHV

[Ville Syrjälä]

On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 10:06:54AM -0000, Patchwork wrote:
> == Series Details ==
> 
> Series: drm/i915: Check VBT for port presence in addition to the strap on VLV/CHV
> URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/8211/
> State : warning
> 
> == Summary ==
> 
> Series 8211v1 drm/i915: Check VBT for port presence in addition to the strap on VLV/CHV
> http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/8211/revisions/1/mbox
> 
> Test core_auth:
>         Subgroup basic-auth:
>                 pass       -> DMESG-WARN (ro-skl-i7-6700hq)

all skl fails are
[   35.806452] [drm:intel_pipe_update_start [i915]] *ERROR* Potential atomic update failure on pipe A

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95632

> Test drv_module_reload_basic:
>                 pass       -> SKIP       (ro-hsw-i3-4010u)

Reloading i915.ko with
unbinding /sys/class/vtconsole/vtcon0/: (M) frame buffer device
module successfully unloaded
module successfully loaded again
Reloading i915.ko with inject_load_failure=1
unbinding /sys/class/vtconsole/vtcon0/: (M) frame buffer device
Reloading i915.ko with inject_load_failure=2
unbinding /sys/class/vtconsole/vtcon0/: (M) frame buffer device
Reloading i915.ko with inject_load_failure=3
unbinding /sys/class/vtconsole/vtcon0/: (M) frame buffer device
Reloading i915.ko with inject_load_failure=4
unbinding /sys/class/vtconsole/vtcon0/: (M) frame buffer device
Reloading i915.ko with
unbinding /sys/class/vtconsole/vtcon0/: (M) frame buffer device

rmmod: ERROR: Module i915 is in use
rmmod: ERROR: Module i915 is in use
rmmod: ERROR: Module i915 is in use
rmmod: ERROR: Module i915 is in use
rmmod: ERROR: Module i915 is in use

No clue what was using it. Not the first time I've seen this.

<snip>
> fi-bdw-i7-5557u  total:102  pass:93   dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:8  
> fi-hsw-i7-4770k  total:209  pass:187  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:3   skip:19 
> fi-skl-i5-6260u  total:209  pass:198  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:11 
> fi-skl-i7-6700k  total:209  pass:184  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:25 
> fi-snb-i7-2600   total:209  pass:167  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:3   skip:39 
> ro-bdw-i5-5250u  total:102  pass:93   dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:8  
> ro-bdw-i7-5600u  total:102  pass:75   dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:26 
> ro-byt-n2820     total:209  pass:169  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:3   skip:37 
> ro-hsw-i3-4010u  total:209  pass:185  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:24 
> ro-hsw-i7-4770r  total:102  pass:82   dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:19 
> ro-ilk-i7-620lm  total:1    pass:0    dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:0  
> ro-ilk1-i5-650   total:204  pass:146  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:1   skip:57 
> ro-ivb-i7-3770   total:102  pass:75   dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:26 
> ro-ivb2-i7-3770  total:102  pass:79   dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:22 
> ro-skl-i7-6700hq total:204  pass:173  dwarn:10  dfail:0   fail:0   skip:21 
> ro-snb-i7-2620M  total:102  pass:72   dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:29 
> ro-bdw-i7-5557U failed to connect after reboot

So this bdw is indicates as having some other issues. But looking at the
visualization page I see that many other machines are failing to complete
the test run. It's a problem already in nightly, but it seems rather
strange to leave that out of this report. How can anyone be sure that
anything at all got tested if we just silently skip a significant portion
of the tests?

What's even more strange is that the bsw isn't listed anywhere. Looking
at the CI board it's only run 1 out of the last 5 runs. What's going on,
and why aren't these results telling us that something may be wrong on
that machine?

> 
> Results at /archive/results/CI_IGT_test/RO_Patchwork_1091/
> 
> 357b87b drm-intel-nightly: 2016y-06m-03d-08h-46m-18s UTC integration manifest
> 22fc11a drm/i915: Check VBT for port presence in addition to the strap on VLV/CHV

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC