[Intel-gfx] ✗ Ro.CI.BAT: warning for drm/i915: Check VBT for port presence in addition to the strap on VLV/CHV

[Marius Vlad]

On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 03:28:52PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 10:06:54AM -0000, Patchwork wrote:
> > == Series Details ==
> > 
> > Series: drm/i915: Check VBT for port presence in addition to the strap on VLV/CHV
> > URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/8211/
> > State : warning
> > 
> > == Summary ==
> > 
> > Series 8211v1 drm/i915: Check VBT for port presence in addition to the strap on VLV/CHV
> > http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/8211/revisions/1/mbox
> > 
> > Test core_auth:
> >         Subgroup basic-auth:
> >                 pass       -> DMESG-WARN (ro-skl-i7-6700hq)
> 
> all skl fails are
> [   35.806452] [drm:intel_pipe_update_start [i915]] *ERROR* Potential atomic update failure on pipe A
> 
> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95632
> 
> > Test drv_module_reload_basic:
> >                 pass       -> SKIP       (ro-hsw-i3-4010u)
> 
> Reloading i915.ko with
> unbinding /sys/class/vtconsole/vtcon0/: (M) frame buffer device
> module successfully unloaded
> module successfully loaded again
> Reloading i915.ko with inject_load_failure=1
> unbinding /sys/class/vtconsole/vtcon0/: (M) frame buffer device
> Reloading i915.ko with inject_load_failure=2
> unbinding /sys/class/vtconsole/vtcon0/: (M) frame buffer device
> Reloading i915.ko with inject_load_failure=3
> unbinding /sys/class/vtconsole/vtcon0/: (M) frame buffer device
> Reloading i915.ko with inject_load_failure=4
> unbinding /sys/class/vtconsole/vtcon0/: (M) frame buffer device
> Reloading i915.ko with
> unbinding /sys/class/vtconsole/vtcon0/: (M) frame buffer device
> 
> rmmod: ERROR: Module i915 is in use
> rmmod: ERROR: Module i915 is in use
> rmmod: ERROR: Module i915 is in use
> rmmod: ERROR: Module i915 is in use
> rmmod: ERROR: Module i915 is in use
> 
> No clue what was using it. Not the first time I've seen this.
https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/2016-May/096264.html

Seen it myself a few times.
> 
> <snip>
> > fi-bdw-i7-5557u  total:102  pass:93   dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:8  
> > fi-hsw-i7-4770k  total:209  pass:187  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:3   skip:19 
> > fi-skl-i5-6260u  total:209  pass:198  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:11 
> > fi-skl-i7-6700k  total:209  pass:184  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:25 
> > fi-snb-i7-2600   total:209  pass:167  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:3   skip:39 
> > ro-bdw-i5-5250u  total:102  pass:93   dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:8  
> > ro-bdw-i7-5600u  total:102  pass:75   dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:26 
> > ro-byt-n2820     total:209  pass:169  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:3   skip:37 
> > ro-hsw-i3-4010u  total:209  pass:185  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:24 
> > ro-hsw-i7-4770r  total:102  pass:82   dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:19 
> > ro-ilk-i7-620lm  total:1    pass:0    dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:0  
> > ro-ilk1-i5-650   total:204  pass:146  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:1   skip:57 
> > ro-ivb-i7-3770   total:102  pass:75   dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:26 
> > ro-ivb2-i7-3770  total:102  pass:79   dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:22 
> > ro-skl-i7-6700hq total:204  pass:173  dwarn:10  dfail:0   fail:0   skip:21 
> > ro-snb-i7-2620M  total:102  pass:72   dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:29 
> > ro-bdw-i7-5557U failed to connect after reboot
> 
> So this bdw is indicates as having some other issues. But looking at the
> visualization page I see that many other machines are failing to complete
> the test run. It's a problem already in nightly, but it seems rather
> strange to leave that out of this report. How can anyone be sure that
> anything at all got tested if we just silently skip a significant portion
> of the tests?
> 
> What's even more strange is that the bsw isn't listed anywhere. Looking
> at the CI board it's only run 1 out of the last 5 runs. What's going on,
> and why aren't these results telling us that something may be wrong on
> that machine?
> 
> > 
> > Results at /archive/results/CI_IGT_test/RO_Patchwork_1091/
> > 
> > 357b87b drm-intel-nightly: 2016y-06m-03d-08h-46m-18s UTC integration manifest
> > 22fc11a drm/i915: Check VBT for port presence in addition to the strap on VLV/CHV
> 
> -- 
> Ville Syrjälä
> Intel OTC
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 473 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/attachments/20160603/18d3744c/attachment.sig>