[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915: Add missing NULL check before calling initial_watermarks (rev2)
Ville Syrjälä
ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com
Tue Mar 1 10:45:50 UTC 2016
On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 12:32:53PM +0200, Imre Deak wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-03-01 at 07:24 +0000, Patchwork wrote:
> > == Series Details ==
> >
> > Series: drm/i915: Add missing NULL check before calling
> > initial_watermarks (rev2)
> > URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/3930/
> > State : failure
> >
> > == Summary ==
> >
> > Series 3930v2 drm/i915: Add missing NULL check before calling
> > initial_watermarks
> > http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/3930/revisions/2/mbox
> > /
> >
> > Test kms_flip:
> > Subgroup basic-flip-vs-dpms:
> > pass -> DMESG-WARN (ilk-hp8440p) UNSTABLE
> > Subgroup basic-flip-vs-wf_vblank:
> > pass -> FAIL (hsw-gt2)
>
> On HSW this patch shouldn't matter, but I haven't seen this problem
> earlier, so opened a bug for it:
> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94347
Could be a duplicate of
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94294
but I was too lazy to see i the ts vs. seq has the same 1 frame
difference. We should improve the asserts in the test to give us more
easily digestible information.
>
> > dmesg-warn -> PASS (hsw-brixbox)
> > pass -> DMESG-WARN (bdw-ultra)
>
> This is a hw-access-while-suspended failure on the watermark optimize
> path, not relevant to this change. I'm guessing it was introduced by
> the two stage WM support patch. A fix would be to take a wake reference
> around the WM programming, or avoid the programming in cases where
> everything is inactive. Adding Matt and Maarten.
>
> > Subgroup basic-plain-flip:
> > pass -> DMESG-WARN (hsw-gt2)
>
> Same as above.
>
> > Test kms_force_connector_basic:
> > Subgroup force-connector-state:
> > pass -> SKIP (snb-x220t)
> > Subgroup force-edid:
> > pass -> SKIP (snb-x220t)
> > Subgroup force-load-detect:
> > fail -> DMESG-FAIL (ivb-t430s)
> > Test kms_pipe_crc_basic:
> > Subgroup suspend-read-crc-pipe-c:
> > pass -> DMESG-WARN (bsw-nuc-2)
> > Test pm_rpm:
> > Subgroup basic-pci-d3-state:
> > dmesg-warn -> PASS (snb-dellxps)
> > dmesg-warn -> PASS (byt-nuc)
> > Subgroup basic-rte:
> > dmesg-warn -> PASS (snb-x220t)
> > pass -> DMESG-WARN (byt-nuc) UNSTABLE
>
> For all the above failures, the given platforms are not relevant to
> this change.
>
> >
> > bdw-
> > nuci7 total:166 pass:155 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:1
> > 1
> > bdw-
> > ultra total:169 pass:154 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:1
> > 4
> > bsw-nuc-
> > 2 total:169 pass:137 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:1 skip:30
> > byt-
> > nuc total:169 pass:143 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:2
> > 5
> > hsw-
> > brixbox total:169 pass:154 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:1
> > 5
> > hsw-
> > gt2 total:169 pass:156 dwarn:1 dfail:1 fail:1 skip:1
> > 0
> > ilk-
> > hp8440p total:169 pass:117 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:1 skip:5
> > 0
> > ivb-
> > t430s total:169 pass:153 dwarn:0 dfail:1 fail:0 skip:1
> > 5
> > snb-
> > dellxps total:169 pass:144 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:1 skip:2
> > 3
> > snb-
> > x220t total:169 pass:142 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:2 skip:2
> > 4
> >
> > Results at /archive/results/CI_IGT_test/Patchwork_1497/
> >
> > a1c053436ca45c5860f842e294ad29d6055bd43b drm-intel-nightly: 2016y-
> > 02m-29d-16h-58m-26s UTC integration manifest
> > ad1be9242b45df74f512fb0fda89c608c337560d drm/i915: Add missing NULL
> > check before calling initial_watermarks
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list