[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915: Add missing NULL check before calling initial_watermarks (rev2)

[Imre Deak]

On ti, 2016-03-01 at 12:45 +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 12:32:53PM +0200, Imre Deak wrote:
> > On Tue, 2016-03-01 at 07:24 +0000, Patchwork wrote:
> > > == Series Details ==
> > > 
> > > Series: drm/i915: Add missing NULL check before calling
> > > initial_watermarks (rev2)
> > > URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/3930/
> > > State : failure
> > > 
> > > == Summary ==
> > > 
> > > Series 3930v2 drm/i915: Add missing NULL check before calling
> > > initial_watermarks
> > > http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/3930/revisions/2/
> > > mbox
> > > /
> > > 
> > > Test kms_flip:
> > >         Subgroup basic-flip-vs-dpms:
> > >                 pass       -> DMESG-WARN (ilk-hp8440p) UNSTABLE
> > >         Subgroup basic-flip-vs-wf_vblank:
> > >                 pass       -> FAIL       (hsw-gt2)
> > 
> > On HSW this patch shouldn't matter, but I haven't seen this problem
> > earlier, so opened a bug for it:
> > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94347
> 
> Could be a duplicate of
> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94294
> but I was too lazy to see i the ts vs. seq has the same 1 frame
> difference. We should improve the asserts in the test to give us more
> easily digestible information.

Yep, looks like the same ~+16ms difference. I marked the bug as a
duplicate.

--Imre