[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: warning for intel_engine_cs renaming bomb (rev3)

[Tvrtko Ursulin]

On 10/03/16 16:30, Patchwork wrote:
> == Series Details ==
>
> Series: intel_engine_cs renaming bomb (rev3)
> URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/4303/
> State : warning
>
> == Summary ==
>
> Series 4303v3 intel_engine_cs renaming bomb
> http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/4303/revisions/3/mbox/
>
> Test kms_flip:
>          Subgroup basic-flip-vs-dpms:
>                  pass       -> DMESG-WARN (ilk-hp8440p) UNSTABLE

Unrelated https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93787

>          Subgroup basic-flip-vs-modeset:
>                  dmesg-warn -> PASS       (bdw-ultra)
>          Subgroup basic-plain-flip:
>                  pass       -> DMESG-WARN (hsw-brixbox)

Unrelated https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94349

> Test kms_pipe_crc_basic:
>          Subgroup suspend-read-crc-pipe-b:
>                  incomplete -> PASS       (hsw-gt2)
> Test pm_rpm:
>          Subgroup basic-pci-d3-state:
>                  fail       -> DMESG-FAIL (snb-x220t)

Again unrelated https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94349

>                  dmesg-warn -> PASS       (snb-dellxps)
>                  dmesg-warn -> PASS       (hsw-brixbox)
>          Subgroup basic-rte:
>                  dmesg-warn -> PASS       (snb-x220t)
>                  dmesg-warn -> PASS       (bsw-nuc-2)
>
> bdw-nuci7        total:193  pass:181  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:12
> bdw-ultra        total:193  pass:172  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:21
> bsw-nuc-2        total:193  pass:156  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:37
> byt-nuc          total:193  pass:158  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:35
> hsw-brixbox      total:193  pass:170  dwarn:1   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:22
> hsw-gt2          total:193  pass:176  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:17
> ilk-hp8440p      total:193  pass:129  dwarn:1   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:63
> ivb-t430s        total:193  pass:168  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:25
> skl-i5k-2        total:193  pass:170  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:23
> skl-i7k-2        total:193  pass:170  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:23
> skl-nuci5        total:161  pass:152  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:9
> snb-dellxps      total:193  pass:158  dwarn:1   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:34
> snb-x220t        total:193  pass:159  dwarn:0   dfail:1   fail:0   skip:33
>
> Results at /archive/results/CI_IGT_test/Patchwork_1565/
>
> 63461ba49f1bc63fe9dcccdbbaa3a5049c57ae37 drm-intel-nightly: 2016y-03m-10d-13h-21m-51s UTC integration manifest
> 434af94ce2882d30b6a179231e7e15de9c32f78c drm/i915: More renaming of rings to engines
> e21ab7713d974e6d1001ea13fab23c80aaa46500 drm/i915: More intel_engine_cs renaming
> f9c4ea7fc64c8a4a28c8315f908711e959261d95 drm/i915: Rename intel_engine_cs struct members
> c038a428c10d8f6976cd42b94371d8b97890945a drm/i915: Rename intel_engine_cs function parameters
> 310c63e721cbc868fc15d831da6abb09be5de102 drm/i915: Rename local struct intel_engine_cs variables

So looking good to merge.

Any objections wrt rebasing pain? John maybe? :) How exposed your patch 
series are to code which deals a lot with intel_engine_cs?

Regards,

Tvrtko