[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: warning for intel_engine_cs renaming bomb (rev3)

[Arun Siluvery]

On 11/03/2016 09:49, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>
> On 10/03/16 16:30, Patchwork wrote:
>> == Series Details ==
>>
>> Series: intel_engine_cs renaming bomb (rev3)
>> URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/4303/
>> State : warning
>>
>> == Summary ==
>>
>> Series 4303v3 intel_engine_cs renaming bomb
>> http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/4303/revisions/3/mbox/
>>
>> Test kms_flip:
>>          Subgroup basic-flip-vs-dpms:
>>                  pass       -> DMESG-WARN (ilk-hp8440p) UNSTABLE
>
> Unrelated https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93787
>
>>          Subgroup basic-flip-vs-modeset:
>>                  dmesg-warn -> PASS       (bdw-ultra)
>>          Subgroup basic-plain-flip:
>>                  pass       -> DMESG-WARN (hsw-brixbox)
>
> Unrelated https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94349
>
>> Test kms_pipe_crc_basic:
>>          Subgroup suspend-read-crc-pipe-b:
>>                  incomplete -> PASS       (hsw-gt2)
>> Test pm_rpm:
>>          Subgroup basic-pci-d3-state:
>>                  fail       -> DMESG-FAIL (snb-x220t)
>
> Again unrelated https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94349
>
>>                  dmesg-warn -> PASS       (snb-dellxps)
>>                  dmesg-warn -> PASS       (hsw-brixbox)
>>          Subgroup basic-rte:
>>                  dmesg-warn -> PASS       (snb-x220t)
>>                  dmesg-warn -> PASS       (bsw-nuc-2)
>>
>> bdw-nuci7        total:193  pass:181  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0
>> skip:12
>> bdw-ultra        total:193  pass:172  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0
>> skip:21
>> bsw-nuc-2        total:193  pass:156  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0
>> skip:37
>> byt-nuc          total:193  pass:158  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0
>> skip:35
>> hsw-brixbox      total:193  pass:170  dwarn:1   dfail:0   fail:0
>> skip:22
>> hsw-gt2          total:193  pass:176  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0
>> skip:17
>> ilk-hp8440p      total:193  pass:129  dwarn:1   dfail:0   fail:0
>> skip:63
>> ivb-t430s        total:193  pass:168  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0
>> skip:25
>> skl-i5k-2        total:193  pass:170  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0
>> skip:23
>> skl-i7k-2        total:193  pass:170  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0
>> skip:23
>> skl-nuci5        total:161  pass:152  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:9
>> snb-dellxps      total:193  pass:158  dwarn:1   dfail:0   fail:0
>> skip:34
>> snb-x220t        total:193  pass:159  dwarn:0   dfail:1   fail:0
>> skip:33
>>
>> Results at /archive/results/CI_IGT_test/Patchwork_1565/
>>
>> 63461ba49f1bc63fe9dcccdbbaa3a5049c57ae37 drm-intel-nightly:
>> 2016y-03m-10d-13h-21m-51s UTC integration manifest
>> 434af94ce2882d30b6a179231e7e15de9c32f78c drm/i915: More renaming of
>> rings to engines
>> e21ab7713d974e6d1001ea13fab23c80aaa46500 drm/i915: More
>> intel_engine_cs renaming
>> f9c4ea7fc64c8a4a28c8315f908711e959261d95 drm/i915: Rename
>> intel_engine_cs struct members
>> c038a428c10d8f6976cd42b94371d8b97890945a drm/i915: Rename
>> intel_engine_cs function parameters
>> 310c63e721cbc868fc15d831da6abb09be5de102 drm/i915: Rename local struct
>> intel_engine_cs variables
>
> So looking good to merge.
>
> Any objections wrt rebasing pain? John maybe? :) How exposed your patch
> series are to code which deals a lot with intel_engine_cs?

It also affects engine reset patches but I tried to use engine where 
possible so hopefully won't be that bad, atleast we will have consistent 
naming throughout with this.

regard
Arun

>
> Regards,
>
> Tvrtko
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx