[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for series starting with [1/5] drm/i915: Rename local struct intel_engine_cs variables
Daniel Vetter
daniel at ffwll.ch
Wed Mar 16 15:56:40 UTC 2016
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 4:45 PM, Tvrtko Ursulin
<tvrtko.ursulin at linux.intel.com> wrote:
> On 16/03/16 15:40, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 03:35:13PM +0000, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 16/03/16 15:01, Patchwork wrote:
>>>>
>>>> == Series Details ==
>>>>
>>>> Series: series starting with [1/5] drm/i915: Rename local struct
>>>> intel_engine_cs variables
>>>> URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/4508/
>>>> State : failure
>>>>
>>>> == Summary ==
>>>>
>>>> Series 4508v1 Series without cover letter
>>>> http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/4508/revisions/1/mbox/
>>>>
>>>> Test drv_module_reload_basic:
>>>> skip -> PASS (bdw-nuci7)
>>>> Test kms_flip:
>>>> Subgroup basic-flip-vs-wf_vblank:
>>>> pass -> FAIL (ivb-t430s)
>>>
>>>
>>> Unrelated https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94294
>>
>>
>> I'd like people to add a bit more information to these analysis mails.
>> If there's just the bugzilla link I actually have to open it before
>> I can see what the problem was. Makes it harder to keep on top what
>> the most common BAT problems are.
>
>
> Yeah in principle I agree but some of these are the usual suspects which
> have been dragging for so long it would take an iron will (or something
> nastier) to keep repeating the same analysis over and over again.
Someone is asking for a really nasty maintainer to provide motivation?
More seriously&honestly I'm not entirely sure how we can get out of
this "CI seems constantly broken" place :(
-Daniel
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list