[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for series starting with [1/5] drm/i915: Rename local struct intel_engine_cs variables

[Tvrtko Ursulin]

On 16/03/16 15:56, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 4:45 PM, Tvrtko Ursulin
> <tvrtko.ursulin at linux.intel.com> wrote:
>> On 16/03/16 15:40, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 03:35:13PM +0000, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 16/03/16 15:01, Patchwork wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> == Series Details ==
>>>>>
>>>>> Series: series starting with [1/5] drm/i915: Rename local struct
>>>>> intel_engine_cs variables
>>>>> URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/4508/
>>>>> State : failure
>>>>>
>>>>> == Summary ==
>>>>>
>>>>> Series 4508v1 Series without cover letter
>>>>> http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/4508/revisions/1/mbox/
>>>>>
>>>>> Test drv_module_reload_basic:
>>>>>                    skip       -> PASS       (bdw-nuci7)
>>>>> Test kms_flip:
>>>>>            Subgroup basic-flip-vs-wf_vblank:
>>>>>                    pass       -> FAIL       (ivb-t430s)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Unrelated https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94294
>>>
>>>
>>> I'd like people to add a bit more information to these analysis mails.
>>> If there's just the bugzilla link I actually have to open it before
>>> I can see what the problem was. Makes it harder to keep on top what
>>> the most common BAT problems are.
>>
>>
>> Yeah in principle I agree but some of these are the usual suspects which
>> have been dragging for so long it would take an iron will (or something
>> nastier) to keep repeating the same analysis over and over again.
>
> Someone is asking for a really nasty maintainer to provide motivation?
>
> More seriously&honestly I'm not entirely sure how we can get out of
> this "CI seems constantly broken" place :(

I've noticed people are working on some of those constant naggers so 
perhaps there is light at the end of the tunnel.

Key is having the right hardware, and IMHO, assigning people to critical 
BAT tagged Bugzilla's. There is plenty of those, with more or less links 
to CI failure example, so it looks to me there is certainly enough 
material already.

Regards,

Tvrtko