[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for series starting with [1/5] drm/i915: Rename local struct intel_engine_cs variables

[Ville Syrjälä]

On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 03:45:08PM +0000, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> 
> On 16/03/16 15:40, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 03:35:13PM +0000, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> >>
> >> On 16/03/16 15:01, Patchwork wrote:
> >>> == Series Details ==
> >>>
> >>> Series: series starting with [1/5] drm/i915: Rename local struct intel_engine_cs variables
> >>> URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/4508/
> >>> State : failure
> >>>
> >>> == Summary ==
> >>>
> >>> Series 4508v1 Series without cover letter
> >>> http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/4508/revisions/1/mbox/
> >>>
> >>> Test drv_module_reload_basic:
> >>>                   skip       -> PASS       (bdw-nuci7)
> >>> Test kms_flip:
> >>>           Subgroup basic-flip-vs-wf_vblank:
> >>>                   pass       -> FAIL       (ivb-t430s)
> >>
> >> Unrelated https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94294
> >
> > I'd like people to add a bit more information to these analysis mails.
> > If there's just the bugzilla link I actually have to open it before
> > I can see what the problem was. Makes it harder to keep on top what
> > the most common BAT problems are.
> 
> Yeah in principle I agree but some of these are the usual suspects which 
> have been dragging for so long it would take an iron will (or something 
> nastier) to keep repeating the same analysis over and over again.

Just copy pasting a few relevant lines is enough. You already had to
read those lines anyway to look up the bug. You may know it's the same
thing all over again, but no one else will unless they memorized the
bugzilla ids or click on every link in these mails. So I think just
putting up the links without further information is masking the scope of
the problem, and thus making it less likely that someone will step up
and go fix things.

> 
> Sometimes I remember and add a link to new CI logs to the relevant BZ 
> instance which is probably more useful for people looking at BAT marked 
> entries (which are all critical anyway) to gather enough data points 
> when debugging.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Tvrtko

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC