[Intel-gfx] ✗ Ro.CI.BAT: failure for series starting with [v2,1/2] drm/i915/gen9: Assume CDCLK PLL is off if it's not locked
Imre Deak
imre.deak at intel.com
Tue May 24 13:18:05 UTC 2016
On ti, 2016-05-24 at 13:02 +0000, Patchwork wrote:
> == Series Details ==
>
> Series: series starting with [v2,1/2] drm/i915/gen9: Assume CDCLK PLL
> is off if it's not locked
> URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/7631/
> State : failure
>
> == Summary ==
>
> Series 7631v1 Series without cover letter
> http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/7631/revisions/1/mbox
>
> Test gem_busy:
> Subgroup basic-parallel-vebox:
> dmesg-warn -> PASS (ro-skl-i7-6700hq)
> Test gem_exec_basic:
> Subgroup readonly-vebox:
> pass -> DMESG-WARN (ro-skl-i7-6700hq)
[drm:intel_pipe_update_start [i915]] *ERROR* Potential atomic update failure on pipe A
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95632
> Test gem_exec_flush:
> Subgroup basic-batch-kernel-default-cmd:
> pass -> FAIL (ro-byt-n2820)
Stack trace:
#0 [__igt_fail_assert+0x101]
#1 [gem_execbuf+0x44]
#2 [batch+0x4bd]
#3 [__real_main481+0x308]
#4 [main+0x23]
#5 [__libc_start_main+0xf0]
#6 [_start+0x29]
#7 [<unknown>+0x29]
child 0 failed with exit status 99
(gem_exec_flush:6087) ioctl-wrappers-CRITICAL: Failed assertion: __gem_execbuf(fd, execbuf) == 0
(gem_exec_flush:6087) ioctl-wrappers-CRITICAL: error: -22 != 0
Subtest basic-batch-kernel-default-cmd failed.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95372
> Test gem_exec_store:
> Subgroup basic-bsd:
> pass -> DMESG-WARN (ro-skl-i7-6700hq)
> Test gem_ringfill:
> Subgroup basic-default-interruptible:
> dmesg-warn -> PASS (ro-skl-i7-6700hq)
> Test gem_storedw_loop:
> Subgroup basic-default:
> dmesg-warn -> PASS (ro-skl-i7-6700hq)
> Test kms_pipe_crc_basic:
> Subgroup bad-pipe:
> dmesg-warn -> PASS (ro-skl-i7-6700hq)
> Test kms_psr_sink_crc:
> Subgroup psr_basic:
> pass -> DMESG-WARN (ro-skl-i7-6700hq)
> Test kms_setmode:
> Subgroup basic-clone-single-crtc:
> pass -> DMESG-WARN (ro-skl-i7-6700hq)
> Test pm_rpm:
> Subgroup basic-pci-d3-state:
> fail -> DMESG-WARN (ro-skl-i7-6700hq)
All the remaining WARNs are the above "Potential atomic update failure"
error message, so assuming the same bug as above.
>
> ro-bdw-i5-
> 5250u total:209 pass:172 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:37
> ro-bdw-i7-
> 5557U total:209 pass:197 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:12
> ro-bdw-i7-
> 5600u total:209 pass:180 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:1 skip:28
> ro-byt-
> n2820 total:209 pass:169 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:3 skip:37
> ro-hsw-i3-
> 4010u total:209 pass:186 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:23
> ro-hsw-i7-
> 4770r total:209 pass:186 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:23
> ro-ilk-i7-
> 620lm total:209 pass:146 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:1 skip:62
> ro-ilk1-i5-
> 650 total:204 pass:146 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:1 skip:57
> ro-ivb-i7-
> 3770 total:209 pass:177 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:32
> ro-ivb2-i7-
> 3770 total:209 pass:181 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:28
> ro-skl-i7-6700hq
> total:204 pass:175 dwarn:8 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:21
> ro-snb-i7-
> 2620M total:209 pass:170 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:1 skip:38
>
> Results at /archive/results/CI_IGT_test/RO_Patchwork_993/
>
> 8621fb5 drm-intel-nightly: 2016y-05m-23d-18h-18m-33s UTC integration
> manifest
> a416d47 drm/i915/bxt: Sanitize CDCLK to fix breakage during S4 resume
> c1d96b1 drm/i915/gen9: Assume CDCLK PLL is off if it's not locked
>
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list