[Intel-gfx] ✗ Ro.CI.BAT: failure for series starting with [v2,1/2] drm/i915/gen9: Assume CDCLK PLL is off if it's not locked
Imre Deak
imre.deak at intel.com
Fri May 27 08:48:54 UTC 2016
On ti, 2016-05-24 at 16:18 +0300, Imre Deak wrote:
> On ti, 2016-05-24 at 13:02 +0000, Patchwork wrote:
> > == Series Details ==
> >
> > Series: series starting with [v2,1/2] drm/i915/gen9: Assume CDCLK PLL
> > is off if it's not locked
> > URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/7631/
> > State : failure
> >
> > == Summary ==
> >
> > Series 7631v1 Series without cover letter
> > http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/7631/revisions/1/mbox
> >
> > Test gem_busy:
> > Subgroup basic-parallel-vebox:
> > dmesg-warn -> PASS (ro-skl-i7-6700hq)
> > Test gem_exec_basic:
> > Subgroup readonly-vebox:
> > pass -> DMESG-WARN (ro-skl-i7-6700hq)
>
> [drm:intel_pipe_update_start [i915]] *ERROR* Potential atomic update failure on pipe A
>
> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95632
>
> > Test gem_exec_flush:
> > Subgroup basic-batch-kernel-default-cmd:
> > pass -> FAIL (ro-byt-n2820)
>
> Stack trace:
> #0 [__igt_fail_assert+0x101]
> #1 [gem_execbuf+0x44]
> #2 [batch+0x4bd]
> #3 [__real_main481+0x308]
> #4 [main+0x23]
> #5 [__libc_start_main+0xf0]
> #6 [_start+0x29]
> #7 [+0x29]
> child 0 failed with exit status 99
>
> (gem_exec_flush:6087) ioctl-wrappers-CRITICAL: Failed assertion: __gem_execbuf(fd, execbuf) == 0
> (gem_exec_flush:6087) ioctl-wrappers-CRITICAL: error: -22 != 0
> Subtest basic-batch-kernel-default-cmd failed.
>
> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95372
>
> > Test gem_exec_store:
> > Subgroup basic-bsd:
> > pass -> DMESG-WARN (ro-skl-i7-6700hq)
> > Test gem_ringfill:
> > Subgroup basic-default-interruptible:
> > dmesg-warn -> PASS (ro-skl-i7-6700hq)
> > Test gem_storedw_loop:
> > Subgroup basic-default:
> > dmesg-warn -> PASS (ro-skl-i7-6700hq)
> > Test kms_pipe_crc_basic:
> > Subgroup bad-pipe:
> > dmesg-warn -> PASS (ro-skl-i7-6700hq)
> > Test kms_psr_sink_crc:
> > Subgroup psr_basic:
> > pass -> DMESG-WARN (ro-skl-i7-6700hq)
> > Test kms_setmode:
> > Subgroup basic-clone-single-crtc:
> > pass -> DMESG-WARN (ro-skl-i7-6700hq)
> > Test pm_rpm:
> > Subgroup basic-pci-d3-state:
> > fail -> DMESG-WARN (ro-skl-i7-6700hq)
>
> All the remaining WARNs are the above "Potential atomic update failure"
> error message, so assuming the same bug as above.
I pushed the patchset to -dinq, thanks for the review.
> > ro-bdw-i5-
> > 5250u total:209 pass:172 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:37
> > ro-bdw-i7-
> > 5557U total:209 pass:197 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:12
> > ro-bdw-i7-
> > 5600u total:209 pass:180 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:1 skip:28
> > ro-byt-
> > n2820 total:209 pass:169 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:3 skip:37
> > ro-hsw-i3-
> > 4010u total:209 pass:186 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:23
> > ro-hsw-i7-
> > 4770r total:209 pass:186 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:23
> > ro-ilk-i7-
> > 620lm total:209 pass:146 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:1 skip:62
> > ro-ilk1-i5-
> > 650 total:204 pass:146 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:1 skip:57
> > ro-ivb-i7-
> > 3770 total:209 pass:177 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:32
> > ro-ivb2-i7-
> > 3770 total:209 pass:181 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:28
> > ro-skl-i7-6700hq
> > total:204 pass:175 dwarn:8 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:21
> > ro-snb-i7-
> > 2620M total:209 pass:170 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:1 skip:38
> >
> > Results at /archive/results/CI_IGT_test/RO_Patchwork_993/
> >
> > 8621fb5 drm-intel-nightly: 2016y-05m-23d-18h-18m-33s UTC integration
> > manifest
> > a416d47 drm/i915/bxt: Sanitize CDCLK to fix breakage during S4 resume
> > c1d96b1 drm/i915/gen9: Assume CDCLK PLL is off if it's not locked
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list