[Intel-gfx] [i-g-t PATCH 1/3] tests: add more checks for finding the debugfs in script based tests
Jani Nikula
jani.nikula at intel.com
Fri Oct 14 13:07:56 UTC 2016
On Fri, 14 Oct 2016, Petri Latvala <petri.latvala at intel.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 02:50:49PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> On Fri, 14 Oct 2016, Petri Latvala <petri.latvala at intel.com> wrote:
>> > On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 03:59:55PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> >> While at it, make debugfs_path point at the debugfs root, not
>> >> dri. This'll be handy in future work.
>> >>
>> >> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula at intel.com>
>> >> ---
>> >> tests/drm_lib.sh | 16 ++++++++++------
>> >> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>> >>
>> >> diff --git a/tests/drm_lib.sh b/tests/drm_lib.sh
>> >> index 113da4c7d645..87e3ad0ab547 100755
>> >> --- a/tests/drm_lib.sh
>> >> +++ b/tests/drm_lib.sh
>> >> @@ -41,18 +41,22 @@ do_or_die() {
>> >> $@ > /dev/null 2>&1 || (echo "FAIL: $@ ($?)" && exit $IGT_EXIT_FAILURE)
>> >> }
>> >>
>> >> -if [ -d /debug/dri ] ; then
>> >> - debugfs_path=/debug/dri
>> >> +if [ -d /sys/kernel/debug ]; then
>> >> + debugfs_path=/sys/kernel/debug
>> >> +elif [ -d /debug ]; then
>> >> + debugfs_path=/debug
>> >> +else
>> >> + skip "debugfs not found"
>> >> fi
>> >
>> > Would parsing the output of `mount -t debugfs` be an option?
>>
>> I contemplated that, but decided that should be a separate change later
>> on. I can send a patch on top if you like.
>
>
> Yes, separate patch, but no hurry on that one. Another patch for
> making the same change in tools/intel_gpu_abrt would also be nice.
>
>
> The series is
>
> Reviewed-by: Petri Latvala <petri.latvala at intel.com>
Thanks, pushed.
BR,
Jani.
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list