[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 01/11] drm/i915/skl+: Prepare for removing data rate from skl watermark state, v2.

Paulo Zanoni paulo.r.zanoni at intel.com
Thu Oct 27 17:48:19 UTC 2016


Em Qui, 2016-10-27 às 10:31 +0200, Maarten Lankhorst escreveu:
> Op 27-10-16 om 09:12 schreef Daniel Vetter:
> > 
> > On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 03:41:29PM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> > > 
> > > Changes since v1:
> > > - Remove plane->pipe checks, they're implied by the macros.
> > > - Split unrelated changes to a separate commit.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst at linux.intel.c
> > > om>
> > Drive-by review: The above commit message is way too thin. It
> > prepares for
> > something, but I can't make any connection at all to that
> > something. 1-2
> > sentences about why are needed here I think.
> 
> Hm, seems to have been lost somewhere. It was on my previous
> submission:
> 
> Caching is not required, drm_atomic_crtc_state_for_each_plane_state
> can be used to inspect all plane_states that are assigned to the
> current crtc_state, so we can just recalculate every time.

My review of v1 also complained about the commit message, so I got
surprised by seeing it just go away in v2. 

If my understanding of the code is correct, I think the text would make
more sense if it was rewritten to:

Caching is not required, drm_atomic_crtc_state_for_each_plane_state can
be used to inspect the states of all planes assigned to the CRTC even
if they are not part of crtc_state, so we can just recalculate every
time.

But feel free to not use the text above if you think it's not
completely accurate.

With the commit message problem solved somehow:
Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni at intel.com>

> 
> ~Maarten
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx


More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list