[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: warning for series starting with [1/2] drm/i915: Pre-calculate engine context size

[Joonas Lahtinen]

On ke, 2017-04-26 at 10:43 +0000, Saarinen, Jani wrote:
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > Subject: [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: warning for series starting with [1/2] drm/i915:
> > Pre-calculate engine context size
> > 
> > == Series Details ==
> > 
> > Series: series starting with [1/2] drm/i915: Pre-calculate engine context size
> > URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/23559/
> > State : warning
> > 
> > == Summary ==
> > 
> > Series 23559v1 Series without cover letter
> > https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/23559/revisions/1/mbox/
> > 
> > Test drv_module_reload:
> >         Subgroup basic-no-display:
> >                 pass       -> DMESG-WARN (fi-hsw-4770r)
> >                 pass       -> DMESG-WARN (fi-byt-j1900)
> >                 pass       -> DMESG-WARN (fi-byt-n2820)
> >                 pass       -> DMESG-WARN (fi-ivb-3520m)
> >                 pass       -> DMESG-WARN (fi-ilk-650)
> >                 pass       -> DMESG-WARN (fi-snb-2520m)
> >                 pass       -> DMESG-WARN (fi-hsw-4770)
> >                 pass       -> DMESG-WARN (fi-ivb-3770)
> >                 pass       -> DMESG-WARN (fi-snb-2600)
> >         Subgroup basic-reload:
> >                 pass       -> DMESG-WARN (fi-hsw-4770r)
> >                 pass       -> DMESG-WARN (fi-byt-j1900)
> >                 pass       -> DMESG-WARN (fi-byt-n2820)
> >                 pass       -> DMESG-WARN (fi-ivb-3520m)
> >                 pass       -> DMESG-WARN (fi-ilk-650)
> >                 pass       -> DMESG-WARN (fi-snb-2520m)
> >                 pass       -> DMESG-WARN (fi-hsw-4770)
> >                 pass       -> DMESG-WARN (fi-ivb-3770)
> >                 pass       -> DMESG-WARN (fi-snb-2600)
> >         Subgroup basic-reload-final:
> >                 pass       -> DMESG-WARN (fi-hsw-4770r)
> >                 pass       -> DMESG-WARN (fi-byt-j1900)
> >                 pass       -> DMESG-WARN (fi-byt-n2820)
> >                 pass       -> DMESG-WARN (fi-ivb-3520m)
> >                 pass       -> DMESG-WARN (fi-ilk-650)
> >                 pass       -> DMESG-WARN (fi-snb-2520m)
> >                 pass       -> DMESG-WARN (fi-hsw-4770)
> >                 pass       -> DMESG-WARN (fi-ivb-3770)
> >                 pass       -> DMESG-WARN (fi-snb-2600)
> >         Subgroup basic-reload-inject:
> >                 pass       -> DMESG-WARN (fi-hsw-4770r)
> >                 pass       -> DMESG-WARN (fi-byt-j1900)
> >                 pass       -> DMESG-WARN (fi-byt-n2820)
> >                 pass       -> DMESG-WARN (fi-ivb-3520m)
> >                 pass       -> DMESG-WARN (fi-ilk-650)
> >                 pass       -> DMESG-WARN (fi-snb-2520m)
> >                 pass       -> DMESG-WARN (fi-hsw-4770)
> >                 pass       -> DMESG-WARN (fi-ivb-3770)
> >                 pass       -> DMESG-WARN (fi-snb-2600)
> > Test gem_exec_suspend:
> >         Subgroup basic-s4-devices:
> >                 pass       -> DMESG-WARN (fi-kbl-7560u) fdo#100125
> 
> How about trybot first?

What exactly is the point of running CI on intel-gfx traffic if
everything is supposed to be sent to trybot first? Sending trivial
series to trybot first would double the already untolerable latency of
the system. intel-gfx is supposed to be a place to discuss the patches
among the developers, or you think we should have intel-gfx-dev for
that and everything but ready-to-merge series are sent there?

Regards, Joonas
-- 
Joonas Lahtinen
Open Source Technology Center
Intel Corporation